Montgomery Cellular

Dobler v Montgomery Cellular Holding (Del Ch 2004)

Opinion

The Valuation Methods II.E.

The Respondent's Expert Testimony IV.A.

The Petitioners' Expert Testimony IV.B.

The Petitioners' Comparable Transactions Analysis IV.B.1.
- The Verizon Transaction IV.B.1.a.
- The CD Settlement IV.B.1.b.
- Similarly Sized Transactions IV.B.1.c.
The Petitioners' Comparative Company Analysis IV.B.2.
The Petitioners' DCF Analysis IV.B.3.

Montgomery Cellular Holding v Dobler (Del Sup 2005)

Opinion

Facts

The Parties

Background

The Valuations of the Trial Experts and the Decision
of the Court of Chancery

MCHC’s Claims Of Error On Appeal

MCHC’s Challenges to the Court Of Chancery’s
Factual Findings

The Verizon Transaction 1.

The Treatment of the Synergies in the Verizon Transaction 1.a.
Whether Including the Verizon Transaction Price
Was Inconsistent with a Going Concern Valuation 1.b.

Adjustment of the CD Settlement Price to Eliminate the Settlement Discount 2.
Eliminating the Management Fees Paid by MCHC to
Palmer as an Input to the DCF Valuation 3.

The Adoption of a Flat Prejudgment Interest Rate

The Minority Shareholders’ Cross-Appeal

Conclusion

// This display the document title in the html page document.write(document.title);