|
Summary
|
2nd
Circuit rules that proxy access bylaw proposals
can't be excluded under Rule 14a-8(i)(8)
- Overturns a 2005 SDNY decision in favor of AIG
- Court declined to defer to SEC's interpretation of the
rule
- Rule 14a-8(i)(8) is the
election exclusion
- Rule 14a-8(i) allows companies to exclude
specified types of shareholder proposals from the company's own proxy statement
- See Rule 14a-8(i)
- In particular, per Rule 14a-8(i)(8), a company can exclude
a proposal that "relates to an election" of directors
- See Rule 14a-8(i)(8)
- AFSCME had submitted a shareholder proposal to
AIG
- Proposed to amend AIG's bylaws so that
shareholder-nominated candidates would be
included on the corporate ballot
- SEC supported AIG's decision to exclude this
proposal
- Initially, by issuing a no-action letter at AIG's
request
- Later, by filing amicus briefs in support of its
position
- On grounds that it "related to an election"of directors
- 2nd Circuit found that SEC had been inconsistent
in interpreting Rule 14a-8(i)(8)
- So that typical deference to an agency's
interpretation
of its own rule didn't apply
- 2nd Circuit applies SEC's 1976 interpretation
- Rather than SEC's current interpretation
- To find that Rule 14a-8(i)(8) applies to
"shareholder proposals that relate to a particular election and not to
proposals that, like AFSCMEs, would establish the procedural rules
governing elections generally."
|
Second Circuit Opinion 9.05.06
|
Opinion
2006 WL 2557941 (2d Cir. 9.05.06)
Other
filings
|
SDNY Opinion 2005
|
Opinion
3.22.05 361 F Supp 2d 344
Filings
|
SEC Rules and Releases
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
|
Rules
- "on what other bases may a company rely to
exclude my proposal?" ...
- "Relates to election: If the proposal relates to an election for membership on the company's board of directors or
analogous governing body;"
Emphasis added
- Sometimes called the election exclusion
Following
are SEC releases cited in 2nd Circuit opinion
- Proposed changes to Rule 14a-8
- SEC statement about Rule 14a-8
- Adopted changes to Rule 14a-8
|
Commentary
|
News
items
Law
firm commentary
|
Archive
|
In
2006, SEC said it would consider proposing amendments to Rule 14a-8 to
address this
- Initially said it would act at its
10.18.06 meeting
- Then said it would act at 12.13.06
meeting
- But dropped matter from final agenda for 12.13.06
meeting
Prior SEC statements
|
|