Overview
|
2008: SEC
staff ruled that companies may exclude proxy access proposals from 2008 proxy
statements ![RiskMetrics Risk & Governance Blog [February 12, 2008]](/_baggage/images/moretxt-4.gif)
- See 2008 SEC No-action letters immediately below
2007:
Overview
of developments following 2nd Circuit ruling in
AFSCME v AIG
See
also Reimbursement of Proxy Expenses
Follow
related developments:
|
SEC No-Action Letters
|
2008:
Excludable per Rule 14a-8(i)(8)
- Each proposal called for bylaw amendment
- Body of SEC response letters
- There appears to be some basis for your view that
_______ may exclude the proposal under rule 14a-8(i)(8). Accordingly, we will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if
_______ omits the proposal from its proxy materials in reliance on rule 14a-8(i)(8).
Bear
Stearns AFSCME
Croghan
Banchares Samuel R. Danziger
E*Trade AFSCME
JP
Morgan Chase AFSCME
Kellwood
Company CalPERS
2008:
Other grounds for exclusion
- Excludable under Rule 14a-8(a)
because it does not recommend or require the board of directors to take any
action
2008
withdrawn proposals
- Professor Bebchuk, proponent
2007
more 2007 archive information
- CalPERS
- Company withdrew opposition and included proposal
- Got 45.3% vote FOR
- Seneca Capital
- Proposal was withdrawn
|
Reimbursement
of Proxy Expenses
for 2007 archive
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
Related Topics |