|
Question 10: Company's procedural requirements
Rule 14a-8(j)
SEC FAQs SLB 14B
|
SLB
14B - Section D 2004
______
- SLB 14B provides that if a company fails to comply with the 80-day
requirement and does not receive a waiver from the SEC staff, the staff
will not require the company to wait the full 80-day period following
submission of the no-action request. In those instances, the SEC staff
generally will consider the merits of a request to exclude and will
communicate its conclusions to the company and the shareholder
proponent, while simultaneously advising the parties of its view that the
company has not followed the appropriate procedures under Rule 14a-8.
- SLB 14B makes it clear that the SEC staff reserves the right to decline to
respond to a Rule 14a-8 request if the company does not comply with the
80-day requirement and cannot demonstrate "good cause" for a waiver of
the requirement.
- The bulletin also provides that the most common basis
for a companys showing of "good cause" and securing a waiver of this
requirement is where the shareholder proposal was not submitted timely
and the company did not receive the proposal until after the 80-day
deadline had passed.
|
Select SEC No-Action Letters
|
SEC
granted waiver
- Waivers were granted per Rule 14a-8(j) where the proposal was
received by the company less than 80 days prior to the planned filing date
- Waivers were granted per Rule 14a-8(j) where the proposal was
received by the company less than 80 days prior to the planned filing date
- Waivers were granted per Rule 14a-8(j) where the proposal was
received by the company less than 80 days prior to the planned filing date
-
Company request
SEC response
- Waiver granted where the company
moved the date of its annual shareholders meeting forward but decided not to
change the proposal deadline even though the date was within the 80-day window
-
Company request
SEC response
- Waiver granted where company changed its fiscal
year, notified the shareholders of the new proposal submission deadline, and
received the proposal less than 80 days prior to the new filing deadline
-
Company request
SEC response
- Company missed the deadline because its
compensation committee could not consider the proposal and related compensation
matters without rescheduling to a time when relevant data would not be available
-
Company request
SEC response
SEC
didn't grant waiver
- John Chevedden
- Redeem the company's poison pill or subject it to
a shareholder vote
- Not excludable per Rule 14a-8(i)(10)
- Company did not file its statement of objections
to including the proposal at least 80 days before the date on which it will file
definitive proxy material as required by rule 14a-8(j)(1)
- Staff wouldn't waive the 80-day requirement
-
Company request
SEC response
- Andrew Marowitz
- Proposal to nominate an individual to the board
of directors
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(i)(8) as relating to an
election to the company's board
- Company also invoked Rule 14a-8(i)(3)
- Company did not file its statement of objections
to including the proposal at least 80 days before the date on which it will file
definitive proxy material as required by rule 14a-8(j)(1)
- Staff wouldn't waive the 80-day requirement
- Waiver not granted
- A shareholder proposal, which recommends that
this company's board implement a confidential voting policy, may not be omitted
from this company's proxy material in reliance upon rule 14a-8(i)(10)
- Waiver not granted
- A revised shareholder proposal, which requests
that this companys board of directors redeem the shareholder rights previously
issued unless their issuance is approved by shareholders, may not be omitted
from the companys proxy material under rule 14a-8(e)(2)
-
Company request
SEC response
|
Related Topics
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
|