|
Question 7: Attendance at shareholders' meeting
Rule 14a-8(h)
SEC FAQs SLB 14
|
SLB
14
- C.4.a Prior written representation no
longer required
- C.4.b Statement of non-attendance
- C.4.c Covering two calendar years
- Section C.5
________
- A written statement of intent to attend the
meeting is not required
- But, if a proponent indicates in an unsolicited, written statement that he
won't attend, the company may then omit the proposal
- If the
company demonstrates that this position applies, it can request a two-year
no-action letter. It will then only have to notify the SEC if
the proponent attempts another submission within the two-year period and will
not have to go through a formal no-action process
|
2007 - 2008 No-Action Letters
|
Excludable
- John G. Carlevaro
- Re: stock awards
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(h)(3)
- Company included the proposal in its 2007 proxy
but neither the proponent nor a representative presented the proposal during the
2007 annual meeting
- George F. Longino III
- Re: compensation
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(h)(3)
- Company included the proposal in its 2007 proxy
but neither the proponent nor a representative presented the proposal during the
2007 annual meeting
- Robert D. Morse
- Re: compensation
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(h)(3)
- Company also invoked Rule 14a-8(i)(12)(i)
- Company included the proposal in its 2007 proxy
but neither the proponent nor a representative presented the proposal during the
2007 annual meeting
- Will apply to any future submission to the
company by the same proponent with respect to any shareholder meetings held
during calendar year 2009
- Mary F. Morse Family Trust
- No basis to reconsider Coca-Cola Co. (December
27, 2007)
- Robert D. Morse
- Re: compensation
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(h)(3)
- Company included the proposal in its 2007 proxy
but neither the proponent nor a representative presented the proposal during the
2007 annual meeting
- Mary F. Morse
- Re: compensation
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(h)(3)
- Company included the proposal in its 2007 proxy
but neither the proponent nor a representative presented the proposal during the
2007 annual meeting
- Will apply to any future submission to the
company by the same proponent with respect to any shareholder meetings held
during calendar year 2009
- Robert D. Morse
- Re: compensation
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(h)(3)
- Company included the proposal in its 2007 proxy
but neither the proponent nor a representative presented the proposal during the
2007 annual meeting
- Will apply to any future submission to the
company by the same proponent with respect to any shareholder meetings held
during calendar year 2009
- Andrew Dakos, on behalf of Full Value Partners
L.P.
- Requests that trust conduct a self-tender offer,
and if this offer results in less than 50% of outstanding shares being tendered,
then the trust should be liquidated
- Excludable per Rule 14a-8(h)
- May also exclude any proposals by the proponents
for inclusion in the trust's 2009 proxy materials
Withdrawn
- Robert A. Belfield
- Re: compensation
- Company invoked Rule 14a-8(h)(3)
- Withdrawn
|
No-Action Letters
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
|
Proposal
excluded
- Limits on executive compensation
- Proponent made proposal in 2005,
failed to attend 2005 meeting
- Allowed exclusion based on company's
representation that it had included the proponents proposal in its 2004 proxy statement, but that neither the
proponent nor his representative presented the proposal at the meeting,
and the proponent did not state a "good cause" for his failure to present the
proposal)
- Proposal to these companies that
company's board return the word ''against'' to proxy material concerning
director votes, may be omitted from the company's proxy material under rule
14a-8(h)(3)
- Companies included proposal in their 2004
proxy but neither the proponent nor a representative presented the proposal
during the 2004 annual meeting. Proponent has
not stated ''good cause'' for failing to present the proposal
- Response will apply to any future submissions to
the company by the same proponent with respect to a shareholder meeting in 2006
Not
excludable
- Company could not
exclude certain proposals from proxy materials for meetings during the
following two years when the company had permitted an earlier proposal from the
same proponent to be introduced and voted upon at the 2003
annual meeting despite the fact that neither the proponent nor his authorized
representative attended the meeting
|
Related Topics
|