|
Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust v. Jabil
Circuit, Inc.
USDC MD Florida
Option Timing
Background
|
Company
background
Litigation
background
- Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust v. Jabil
Circuit, Inc.
- USDC
MD Florida (Tampa) 06-cv-01716-SDM-EAJ
- Filed 9.18.06
Lead
plaintiffs
- Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern
California and Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineer
SEC
disclosure
- Form 10-Q
7.08.08 At page 49
..., on April 9, 2008, the court dismissed the First Amended Consolidated Class
Action Complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend such complaint on or
before May 12, 2008. On May 12, 2008, plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class
Action Complaint. The Second Amended Class Action Complaint asserts
substantially the same causes of action against the same defendants, predicated
largely on the same allegations of fact as in the First Amended Consolidated
Class Action Complaint except insofar as plaintiffs added KPMG LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, as a defendant and added
additional allegations with respect to (a) pre-class period option grants, (b)
the professional background of certain defendants, (c) option grants to
non-executive employees, (d) our restatement of our financial results for
certain periods between 1996 and 2005 and (e) trading by the named plaintiffs
and certain of the defendants during the class period. The Second Amended Class
Action Complaint also includes an additional claim for insider trading against
certain defendants pursuant to Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1 promulgated pursuant to
the Exchange Act. We believe that the Second Amended Class Action Complaint is
as without merit as the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and we
will continue to vigorously defend the action, although no assurance can be
given as to the ultimate outcome of any such further proceedings.
|
Claims
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
|
Complaint
|
Motion to
Dismiss Granted
|
Company
motion
Supplemental
filings
Opinion
- The defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
Counts one, two, three, and four are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The lead
plaintiffs amend the complaint on or before Monday, 5.12.08. The
defendants request for oral argument is DENIED AS MOOT.
|
Counsel
|
Lead
plaintiff
Company
defense
|
Related Topics
|