Company background

• News-stock chart
• Company website
• SEC EDGAR

Litigation background

• Raymond Ferrari v. Joseph P Gisch, et al
• USDC CD California (Los Angeles) 2:03-cv-07063-SGL-SH

• Related Case: 2:04cv735-MMM(SHx)

• Judge Stephen G. Larson
• Filed: 10.01.03

Lead plaintiffs

• LeRoy Schneider, Rand Skolmick and Paul Poppe

SEC disclosures

• Form 10-Q  8.09.05 At page 31
  In re DDi Corp. Securities Litigation, Case No. CV 03-7063 MMM (SHx) multiple defendant groups filed motions to dismiss the plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint on March 25, 2005. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motions to dismiss on April 25, 2005. On May 16, 2005, the defendants filed replies in support of the motions to dismiss. On May 6, 2005, the individual defendants also filed a supplemental brief in further support of the motion to dismiss. On May 20, 2005, the plaintiffs filed an opposition to this supplemental brief. On July 20, 2005, without oral argument, the Court entered an Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. The Courts Order granted the motions to dismiss with prejudice to the extent the plaintiffs asserted claims on behalf of those who purchased the convertible notes. The Courts Order granted the motions to dismiss with prejudice as to the plaintiffs Section 12(a)(2) claim against the individual defendants. The Courts Order denied the motions to dismiss with respect to the plaintiffs Section 11 and 15 claims. The Courts Order provided that, by August 8, 2005, the plaintiffs must file either an amended complaint or a notice confirming that the consolidated second amended complaint would remain operative. If the plaintiffs choose the latter course of action, the defendants will be required to file an answer to the operative complaint by August 29, 2005.
   

Ruling

• Opinion  7.20.05

• In re DDi Corp. Sec. Litig., No. 03 Civ. 7063
  2005 WL 3090882 (C.D. Cal. July 21, 2005)

Lead plaintiff

• Schiffrin Barroway

Company defense

• Heller Ehrman

Rule 10b Private Actions