|
 Revlon
v MacAndrews & Forbes Del 1985
- Board terminated auction prematurely
by adopting lock-up and no shop provisions
Paramount
v Time Del 1990
- Time's entry into stock-for-stock merger
agreement did not trigger
Revlon duties
Paramount
v QVC Network Del 1994
- Because the merger transaction approved by the
board resulted in a transfer of voting control from the Paramount public
shareholders to the controlling shareholder of the bidder (Sumner Redstone), the
transaction was a sale of control
- Triggered
Revlon duties to obtain the best value reasonably
available
- Court found that the Paramount directors had
failed to satisfy that duty in favoring Viacom
Arnold
v Society for Savings
Del 1994
- Affirms Chancery Court determination of no change
of control
- Control would remain "in a large, fluid,
changeable and changing market"
 In
re Santa Fe Pacific
Del 1995
Barkan
v Amsted Industries
Del 1989
Ivanhoe
Partners v Newmont Mining Del 1987 Desert
Partners v USG
ND Ill 1988 
BNS
v Koppers D Del 1988
City
Capital Associates v Interco
Del Ch 1988
Black
& Decker v American Standard D Del 1988
Mendel
v Carroll Del Ch 1994
Bershad
v Curtiss-Wright Del 1987
McMullin
v Beran 765 A2d 910
Citron
v Fairchild Camera
Del 1989
In
re Holly Farms
Del Ch 1989
In
re Sea-Land Del Ch 1993
Mills
Acquisition v Macmillan Del 1989 ConAgra
v Cargill
Neb 1986
In
re J P Stevens & Co Del Ch 1988
Samjens
Partners I v Burlington Industries
SDNY 1987
CRTF
Corp v Federated Dept Stores SDNY 1988
Black
& Decker v American Standard
D Del 1988
Brazen
v Bell Atlantic
Del 1997 Kysor
Industrail v Margaux Del Sup 1996
In
re MAXXAM/Federated Development
Del Ch 1995
|
