Regulation S-X
Rule 3-10 - Appendix A
What Does "100% Owned" Mean Under
Rule 3-10?
Example No. 1: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of
SubA. SubA owns 100% of the voting shares of Sub1.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Is Sub1 a 100%-owned subsidiary of SubA? Yes.
Is Sub1 an indirect, 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Example No. 2: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of
SubA. SubA owns 99% of the voting shares of Sub1. The remaining 1% of the
voting shares of Sub1 is owned by a party that is not a 100%-owned subsidiary
of the parent company.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Is Sub1 a 100%-owned subsidiary of SubA? No.
Is Sub1 an indirect, 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.
Example No. 3: Parent company owns 99% of the voting shares of
SubA. The remaining 1% of the voting shares of SubA are owned by a party
that is not a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company. SubA owns 100%
of the voting shares of Sub1.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.
Is Sub1 a 100%-owned subsidiary of SubA? Yes.
Is Sub1 an indirect, 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.
Example No. 4: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of
SubA and 100% of the voting shares of SubB. SubA owns 60% of the voting
shares of Sub1 and SubB owns 40% of the voting shares of Sub1.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Is SubB a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Is Sub1 a 100%-owned subsidiary of SubA? No.
Is Sub1 a 100%-owned subsidiary of SubB? No.
Is Sub1 an indirect, 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Example No. 5: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of
SubA. Parent company also owns 60% of the voting shares of Sub1. SubA owns
40% of the voting shares of Sub1.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Is Sub1 a 100%-owned subsidiary of SubA? No.
Is Sub1 an indirect, 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Example No. 6: Parent company owns 99% of the voting shares of
SubA. As required by the law in its home country, a director of SubA owns
the remaining 1% of the voting shares of SubA. SubA owns 100% of the voting
shares of Sub1.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.
Is Sub1 a 100%-owned subsidiary of SubA? Yes.
Is Sub1 an indirect, 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.
Note: This situation is discussed in the release. Under these
facts, you may wish to request a no-action letter from the Division of Corporation
Finance.
Example No. 7: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of
SubA. SubA has outstanding securities convertible into its voting shares.
These convertible securities are held by a party that is not a 100%-owned
subsidiary of the parent.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.
Example No. 8: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of
SubA. SubA has outstanding securities convertible into the parent company's
voting shares. These convertible securities are held by a party that is
not a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Example No. 9: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares of
SubA. SubA has outstanding options exercisable into its voting shares. These
options are held by a party that is not a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? No.
Example No. 10: Parent company owns 100% of the voting shares
of SubA. SubA has outstanding options exercisable into the parent company's
voting shares. These options are held by a party that is not a 100%-owned
subsidiary of the parent.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Example No. 11: Parent company owns 100% of the common stock of
SubA. SubA has a class of preferred stock outstanding.
That preferred stock is 100% owned by a party that is not a 100%-owned
subsidiary of the parent company. The common equity has full voting rights.
The preferred stock is non-voting.
Is SubA a 100%-owned subsidiary of the parent company? Yes.
Regulatory History
|
|
50 FR 49532, Dec. 2, 1985
65 FR 51692, 51707, Aug. 24, 2000
|
|