Regulation S-K
 
Item 10
General
a.
Application of
Regulation S-K. This part (together with the General Rules and
Regulations under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended (Securities
Act), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (Exchange
Act), the Interpretative Releases under these Acts and the forms under
these Acts ) states the requirements applicable to the content of the
non-financial statement portions of:
1. Registration
statements under the Securities Act to the extent provided in the forms
to be used for registration under such Act; and
2. Registration
statements under
section 12 (subpart C of part 249 of this chapter), annual
or other reports under
sections 13 and
15(d) (subparts D and E of part
249 of this chapter), going-private transaction statements under
section
13 (part 240 of this chapter), tender offer statements under
sections 13 and
14 (part 240 of this chapter), annual reports to security holders
and proxy and information statements under
section 14 (part 240 of this
chapter), and any other documents required to be filed under the Exchange
Act, to the extent provided in the forms and rules under that Act.
b.
Commission policy
on projections. The Commission encourages the use in documents
specified in
Rule
175 under the Securities Act and
Rule
3b-6 under the Exchange Act of management's projections of future
economic performance that have a reasonable basis and are presented in
an appropriate format. The guidelines set forth herein represent the Commission's
views on important factors to be considered in formulating and disclosing
such projections.
1. Basis
for projections. The Commission believes that management must
have the option to present in Commission filings its good faith assessment
of a registrant's future performance. Management, however, must have a
reasonable basis for such an assessment. Although a history of operations
or experience in projecting may be among the factors providing a basis
for management's assessment, the Commission does not believe that a registrant
always must have had such a history or experience in order to formulate
projections with a reasonable basis. An outside review of management's
projections may furnish additional support for having a reasonable basis
for a projection. If management decides to include a report of such a
review in a Commission filing, there also should be disclosure of the
qualifications of the reviewer, the extent of the review, the relationship
between the reviewer and the registrant, and other material factors concerning
the process by which any outside review was sought or obtained. Moreover,
in the case of a registration statement under the Securities Act, the
reviewer would be deemed an expert and an appropriate consent must be
filed with the registration statement.
2. Format
for projections. In determining the appropriate format for projections
included in Commission filings, consideration must be given to, among
other things, the financial items to be projected, the period to be covered,
and the manner of presentation to be used. Although traditionally projections
have been given for three financial items generally considered to be of
primary importance to investors (revenues, net income (loss) and earnings
(loss) per share), projection information need not necessarily be limited
to these three items. However, management should take care to assure that
the choice of items projected is not susceptible of misleading inferences
through selective projection of only favorable items. Revenues, net income
(loss) and earnings (loss) per share usually are presented together in
order to avoid any misleading inferences that may arise when the individual
items reflect contradictory trends. There may be instances, however, when
it is appropriate to present earnings (loss) from continuing operations,
or income (loss) before extraordinary items in addition to or in lieu
of net income (loss). It generally would be misleading to present sales
or revenue projections without one of the foregoing measures of income.
The period that appropriately may be covered by a projection depends to
a large extent on the particular circumstances of the company involved.
For certain companies in certain industries, a projection covering a two
or three year period may be entirely reasonable. Other companies may not
have a reasonable basis for projections beyond the current year. Accordingly,
management should select the period most appropriate in the circumstances.
In addition, management, in making a projection, should disclose what,
in its opinion, is the most probable specific amount or the most reasonable
range for each financial item projected based on the selected assumptions.
Ranges, however, should not be so wide as to make the disclosures meaningless.
Moreover, several projections based on varying assumptions may be judged
by management to be more meaningful than a single number or range and
would be permitted.
3.
Investor
understanding.
1. When
management chooses to include its projections in a Commission filing,
the disclosures accompanying the projections should facilitate investor
understanding of the basis for and limitations of projections. In this
regard investors should be cautioned against attributing undue certainty
to management's assessment, and the Commission believes that investors
would be aided by a statement indicating management's intention regarding
the furnishing of updated projections. The Commission also believes that
investor understanding would be enhanced by disclosure of the assumptions
which in management's opinion are most significant to the projections
or are the key factors upon which the financial results of the enterprise
depend and encourages disclosure of assumptions in a manner that will
provide a framework for analysis of the projection.
2. Management
also should consider whether disclosure of the accuracy or inaccuracy
of previous projections would provide investors with important insights
into the limitations of projections. In this regard, consideration should
be given to presenting the projections in a format that will facilitate
subsequent analysis of the reasons for differences between actual and
forecast results. An important benefit may arise from the systematic analysis
of variances between projected and actual results on a continuing basis,
since such disclosure may highlight for investors the most significant
risk and profit-sensitive areas in a business operation.
3. With
respect to previously issued projections, registrants are reminded of
their responsibility to make full and prompt disclosure of material facts,
both favorable and unfavorable, regarding their financial condition. This
responsibility may extend to situations where management knows or has
reason to know that its previously disclosed projections no longer have
a reasonable basis.
4. Since
a registrant's ability to make projections with relative confidence may
vary with all the facts and circumstances, the responsibility for determining
whether to discontinue or to resume making projections is best left to
management. However, the Commission encourages registrants not to discontinue
or to resume projections in Commission filings without a reasonable basis.
c.
Commission policy
on security ratings. In view of the importance of security ratings
(ratings) to investors and the marketplace, the Commission permits
registrants to disclose, on a voluntary basis, ratings assigned by rating
organizations to classes of debt securities, convertible debt securities
and preferred stock in registration statements and periodic reports. In
addition, the Commission permits, pursuant to
Rule
134(a)(14) under the Securities Act, voluntary disclosure of ratings
assigned by any nationally recognized statistical rating organizations
(NRSROs) in certain communications deemed not to be a prospectus
(tombstone advertisements). Set forth herein are the Commission's
views on important matters to be considered in disclosing security ratings.
1.
Securities
Act filings.
1. If
a registrant includes in a registration statement filed under the Securities
Act any rating(s) assigned to a class of securities, it should consider
including: (A) Any other rating intended for public dissemination assigned
to such class by a NRSRO (additional NRSRO rating) that is available
on the date of the initial filing of the document and that is materially
different from any rating disclosed; and (B) the name of each rating organization
whose rating is disclosed; each such rating organization's definition
or description of the category in which it rated the class of securities;
the relative rank of each rating within the assigning rating organization's
overall classification system; and a statement informing investors that
a security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities,
that it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning
rating organization, and that each rating should be evaluated independently
of any other rating. The registrant also should include the written consent
of any rating organization that is not a NRSRO whose rating is included.
With respect to the written consent of any NRSRO whose rating is included,
see Rule 436(g)
under the Securities Act. When the registrant has filed a registration
statement on Form F-9, see Rule 436(g) under the Securities Act with respect
to the written consent of any rating organization specified in the Instruction
to paragraph (a)(2) of General Instruction I of Form F-9.
2. If
a change in a rating already included is available subsequent to the filing
of the registration statement, but prior to its effectiveness, the registrant
should consider including such rating change in the final prospectus.
If the rating change is material or if a materially different rating from
any disclosed becomes available during this period, the registrant should
consider amending the registration statement to include the rating change
or additional rating and recirculating the preliminary prospectus.
3. If
a materially different additional NRSRO rating or a material change in
a rating already included becomes available during any period in which
offers or sales are being made, the registrant should consider disclosing
such additional rating or rating change by means of post-effective amendment
or sticker to the prospectus pursuant to
Rule
424(b) under the Securities Act, unless, in the case of a registration
statement on Form S-3 , it has been disclosed in a document incorporated
by reference into the registration statement subsequent to its effectiveness
and prior to the termination of the offering.
2.
Exchange
Act filings.
1. If
a registrant includes in a registration statement or periodic report filed
under the Exchange Act any rating(s) assigned to a class of securities,
it should consider including the information specified in
paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A)
and (B) of this section.
2. If
there is a material change in the rating(s) assigned by any NRSRO(s) to
any outstanding class(es) of securities of a registrant subject to the
reporting requirements of section
13(a) or
15(d) of the Exchange Act,
the registrant should consider filing a report on Form 8-K or other appropriate
report under the Exchange Act disclosing such rating change.
d.
Incorporation by
Reference. Where rules, regulations, or instructions to forms
of the Commission permit incorporation by reference, a document may be
so incorporated by reference to the specific document and to the prior
filing or submission in which such document was physically filed or submitted.
Except where a registrant or issuer is expressly required to incorporate a
document or documents by reference (or for purposes of Item 1100(c) of
Regulation AB (§ 229.1100(c)) with respect to an asset-backed issuer, as
that term is defined in Item 1101 of Regulation AB (§ 229.1101)), reference
may not be made to any document which incorporates another document by
reference if the pertinent portion of the document containing the
information or financial statements to be incorporated by reference includes
an incorporation by reference to another document. No document on file with the Commission for more
than five years may be incorporated by reference except:
1. Documents
contained in registration statements, which may be incorporated by reference
as long as the registrant has a reporting requirement with the Commission;
or
2. Documents
that the registrant specifically identifies by physical location by SEC
file number reference, provided such materials have not been disposed
of by the Commission pursuant to its Records Control Schedule (17 CFR
200.80f).
e.
Use of non-GAAP financial
measures in Commission filings.
1.
Whenever one or
more non-GAAP financial measures are included in a filing with the Commission:
i.
The registrant
must include the following in the filing:
A. A
presentation, with equal or greater prominence, of the most directly comparable
financial measure or measures calculated and presented in accordance with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP);
B. A
reconciliation (by schedule or other clearly understandable method), which
shall be quantitative for historical non-GAAP measures presented, and
quantitative, to the extent available without unreasonable efforts, for
forward-looking information, of the differences between the non-GAAP financial
measure disclosed or released with the most directly comparable financial
measure or measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP identified
in paragraph (e)(1)(i)(A) of this section;
C. A
statement disclosing the reasons why the registrant's management believes
that presentation of the non-GAAP financial measure provides useful information
to investors regarding the registrant's financial condition and results
of operations; and
D. To
the extent material, a statement disclosing the additional purposes, if
any, for which the registrant's management uses the non-GAAP financial
measure that are not disclosed pursuant to paragraph (e)(1)(i)(C) of this
section; and
ii.
A registrant
must not:
A. Exclude
charges or liabilities that required, or will require, cash settlement,
or would have required cash settlement absent an ability to settle in
another manner, from non-GAAP liquidity measures, other than the measures
earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA);
B. Adjust
a non-GAAP performance measure to eliminate or smooth items identified
as non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, when the nature of the charge
or gain is such that it is reasonably likely to recur within two years
or there was a similar charge or gain within the prior two years;
C. Present
non-GAAP financial measures on the face of the registrant's financial
statements prepared in accordance with GAAP or in the accompanying notes;
D. Present
non-GAAP financial measures on the face of any pro forma financial
information required to be disclosed by
Article
11 of Regulation S-X (Rules 11-01 through 11-03); or
E. Use
titles or descriptions of non-GAAP financial measures that are the same
as, or confusingly similar to, titles or descriptions used for GAAP financial
measures; and
iii. If
the filing is not an annual report on Form 10-K or Form 20-F, a registrant
need not include the information required by
paragraphs (e)(1)(i)(C) and
(e)(1)(i)(D) of this section if that information was included in its most
recent annual report on Form 10-K or Form 20-F or a more recent filing,
provided that the required information is updated to the extent necessary
to meet the requirements of paragraphs (e)(1)(i)(C) and (e)(1)(i)(D) of
this section at the time of the registrant's current filing.
2.
For purposes of
this paragraph (e), a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure
of a registrant's historical or future financial performance, financial
position or cash flows that:
i. Excludes
amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of excluding
amounts, that are included in the most directly comparable measure calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP in the statement of income, balance
sheet or statement of cash flows (or equivalent statements) of the issuer;
or
ii. Includes
amounts, or is subject to adjustments that have the effect of including
amounts, that are excluded from the most directly comparable measure so
calculated and presented.
3.
For purposes of
this paragraph (e), GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States, except that:
i. In
the case of foreign private issuers whose primary financial statements
are prepared in accordance with non-U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, GAAP refers to the principles under which those primary financial
statements are prepared; and
ii. In
the case of foreign private issuers that include a non-GAAP financial
measure derived from or based on a measure calculated in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, GAAP refers to U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles for purposes of the application of the
requirements of this paragraph (e) to the disclosure of that measure.
4.
For purposes of
this paragraph (e), non-GAAP financial measures exclude:
i. Operating
and other statistical measures; and
ii.
Ratios or
statistical measures calculated using exclusively one or both of:
A. Financial
measures calculated in accordance with GAAP; and
B. Operating
measures or other measures that are not non-GAAP financial measures.
5. For
purposes of this paragraph (e), non-GAAP financial measures exclude financial
measures required to be disclosed by GAAP, Commission rules, or a system
of regulation of a government or governmental authority or self-regulatory
organization that is applicable to the registrant. However, the financial
measure should be presented outside of the financial statements unless
the financial measure is required or expressly permitted by the standard-setter
that is responsible for establishing the GAAP used in such financial statements.
6. The
requirements of paragraph (e) of this section shall not apply to a non-GAAP
financial measure included in disclosure relating to a proposed business
combination, the entity resulting therefrom or an entity that is a party
thereto, if the disclosure is contained in a communication that is subject
to Rule 425
under the Securities Act,
Rules 14a-12
or 14d-2(b)(2)
under the Exchange Act or
Item
1015 of Regulation M-A.
7. The
requirements of paragraph (e) of this section shall not apply to investment
companies registered under section 8 of the Investment Company Act of
1940.
Note to paragraph (e). A non-GAAP
financial measure that would otherwise be prohibited by paragraph (e)(1)(ii)
of this section is permitted in a filing of a foreign private issuer if:
1. The
non-GAAP financial measure relates to the GAAP used in the registrant's
primary financial statements included in its filing with the Commission;
2. The
non-GAAP financial measure is required or expressly permitted by the standard-setter
that is responsible for establishing the GAAP used in such financial statements;
and
3. The
non-GAAP financial measure is included in the annual report prepared by
the registrant for use in the jurisdiction in which it is domiciled, incorporated
or organized or for distribution to its security holders.
Regulatory History |
|
47 FR 11401, Mar. 16, 1982
52 FR 21260, June 5, 1987
58 FR 14665, Mar. 18, 1993
58 FR 62029, Nov. 23, 1993
60 FR 32824, June 23,1995
64 FR 61408, 61443, Nov. 10, 1999
68 FR 4820, 4831, Jan. 30,
2003
SEC Release 33-8518: 70 FR 1506, Jan. 7, 2004 |
|