Company Name: Woodtrails-Seattle, Ltd.
Public Availability Date: Aug. 9, 1982
INQUIRY LETTER
PETTIT & MARTIN
THE TRANSAMERICA BUILDING, 600 MONTGOMERY STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111
(415) 434-4000
June 16, 1982
Office of Chief Counsel
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20549
Attention: David B.H. Martin, Jr., Esq.
Re: Woodtrails - Seattle, Ltd.
Gentlemen:
Our client, Woodtrails - Seattle, Ltd., a California limited partnership (the
"Partnership"), proposes to offer and sell limited partnership interests without
registration under the Securities Act of 1933, in reliance registration under
the Securities Act of 1933, in reliance upon the exemption afforded by Rule 505
of Regulation D (17 C.F.R. §§230.501 through 230.506). The Partnership proposes
to mail a written offer to approximately three hundred thirty persons who have
previously invested in other limited partnerships sponsored by the general
partner of the Partnership. For the reasons stated below, we respectfully
request that the Division of Corporation Finance concur in our view that the
making of such offers does not constitute general solicitation or general
advertising for purposes of Regulation D.
Facts
The general partner of the Partnership has sponsored nine limited partnerships
over the last three years (the "Prior Partnerships"). Each of the Prior
Partnerships offered and sold its securities in reliance on Rule 146. All of the
prior Partnerships are extant, and the general partner of the Partnership
continues to serve as a general partner of each of the Prior Partnerships.
There are, in the aggregate,
approximately three hundred thirty limited partners of the Prior Partnerships.
Each of these limited partners met the suitability standards set forth in
Section (d) (2) of Rule 146 at the time of their purchase. In addition, each of
such purchasers was required to meet specific financial qualification standards
imposed by applicable state law.
The Partnership proposes to
mail to the limited partners of the Prior Partnerships a written offer to
purchase limited partnership interests in the Partnership. Such offer would be
transmitted to all of the limited partners in the Prior Partnerships, except
that no offer will be communicated to any partner if the Partnership is aware
that such persons condition has materially changed so that such person would
not now satisfy the suitability standards which were satisfied at the time of
such persons purchase.
Discussion
Each of the proposed offerees, by definition, has a pre-existing business
relationship with the general partner of the Partnership. It is the belief of
the Partnership that a significant number of the recipients of the proposed
offer will be interested in investing in the Partnership. Furthermore, the
Partnership believes that each of the recipients of the proposed offer has such
knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that he or she is
capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the prospective investment. For
these reasons, we are of the opinion that the proposed communication does not
constitute a general solicitation or general advertising within the meaning of
Rule 502.
Conclusion
The offering proposed to be made by the Partnership would, in our opinion, have
come within the provisions of Section (c) (3) of Rule 146 which permitted
mailings to persons who satisfy the suitability standards of Section(d) (1) of
Rule 146. We do not believe that a type of communication which was permissible
under Rule 146 should be characterized as a prohibited general solicitation or
general advertising under Regulation D. Accordingly, we believe that the
proposed offering does not constitute a general solicitation or general
advertising under Regulation D.
In the event you are unable to
concur in our view we request that you contact the undersigned by telephone
before sending a reply.
Very truly yours,
Robert T. Burke
RTB/mm
cc: Woodtrails - Seattle, Ltd.
STAFF REPLY LETTER
JUL 8 1982
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE
Re: Woodtrails - Seattle, Ltd. ("Woodtrails")
Incoming letter dated June 16, 1982
Your letter seeks interpretive advice from this Division as to the application
of Rule 502(c) under the Securities Act of 1933 to Woodtrails proposal to mail
a written offer to approximately 330 persons who have invested in limited
partnerships sponsored by the general partner of Woodtrails over the last three
years.
As you know, Rule 502(c)
provides that in certain offers or sales under Regulation D neither the issuer
nor any person acting on the issuers behalf shall offer or sell the securities
by any form of general solicitation or general advertising. On the basis of the
facts presented in your letter, this Division is of the view that Woodtrails or
its general partner may make the proposed offers to the investors in prior
limited partnerships sponsored by the general partner without exceeding the
terms of Rule 502(c). In arriving at this position, we note that (1) each of the
proposed offerees has a pre-existing business relationship with the general
partner of Woodtrails, which relationship was established within the last three
years, and (2) the nature of this relationship is evidenced, in part, by the
determination by the general partner at the time of the original investment that
the investors met certain suitability standards and by the belief by Woodtrails
that each of the proposed offerees currently has such knowledge and experience
in financial and business matters that he or she is capable of evaluating the
merits and risks of the prospective investment.
Because this position is based
upon the representations made to the Division in your letter, it should be noted
that any different facts or conditions might require a different conclusion.
Sincerely,
David B.H. Martin, Jr.
Special Counsel
|