Company Name: St. Ives Holding Co.
Public Availability Date: July 22, 1987
INQUIRY LETTER
ADAMS, DUQUE & HAZELTINE
523 WEST SIXTH STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014
(213) 620-1240
April 13, 1987
William E. Morley, Esq.
Chief Counsel
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities & Exchange Commission
450 5th Street N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549
Dear Mr. Morley:
This letter is submitted pursuant to the policies and procedures set forth in
Commission Releases 33-6253 and 33-6269.
1. Introduction
We represent two closely-held
California corporations, St. Ives Laboratories, Inc. ("St. Ives") and Cosmetic
Laboratories, Inc. ("Cosmetic"), which together have a total of seven individual
shareholders. St. Ives and Cosmetic intend to effect a merger reorganization
whereby each of St. Ives and Cosmetic will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of
St. Ives Holding Company ("St. Ives Holding") with St. Ives Holding owning no
assets other than all of the shares of St. Ives and Cosmetic. In the
reorganization, all of the shareholders of St. Ives and Cosmetic will have all
their St. Ives and Cosmetic shares converted into St. Ives Holding common stock
and thus become holders of all of St. Ives Holding common stock.
2. Reorganization to be
Effected in Reliance on Section 3(a)(10) Exemption
The conversion of St. Ives and
Cosmetic shares into St. Ives Holding shares will be exempt from the
registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") in reliance on
Section 3(a)(10) of the Act. Specifically, an application will be filed with the
Department of Corporations of the State of California, and that Department will
hold a hearing to determine the fairness of the ratio of conversion in the
merger reorganization pursuant to the provisions of Section 25142 of the
California General Corporation Law.
3. Subsequent Public
Offering
Assuming a favorable fairness
determination relating to the merger reorganization is reached by the Department
of Corporations, following the hearing and the consummation of the merger
reorganization, St. Ives Holding corporation intends to make a registered public
offering consisting of (1) a yet undetermined number of authorized but unissued
primary St. Ives Holding shares and 2) a secondary offering of a yet
undetermined number of the St. Ives Holding shares received by former St. Ives
and Cosmetic shareholders in the merger reorganization. The former St. Ives and
Cosmetic shareholders who will become shareholders of St. Ives Holding have
requested advice concerning the sale of their restricted unregistered St. Ives
Holding stock not included in the public offering.
4. Manner of Acquisition St.
Ives Shares, Cosmetic Shares and St. Ives Holding Shares
The persons who are proposed to
become the shareholders of St. Ives Holding will have acquired and held their
St. Ives, Cosmetic and St. Ives Holding shares as follows.
The two founders of St. Ives
and Cosmetic corporations will have owned their restricted St. Ives and Cosmetic
shares, along with three minority shareholders of Cosmetic, for in excess of
five years before the merger reorganization pursuant to which they will become
St. Ives Holding shareholders. They will hold their restricted St. Ives Holding
stock for a short period of time before the public offering of St. Ives Holding
stock, and they will hold unregistered St. Ives Holding stock after the
offering.
Two key employees have recently
purchased restricted St. Ives shares, in an exempt transaction, in exchange for
notes in amounts equal to the appraised fair market value of such shares which
shares will be converted into restricted St. Ives Holding stock in the merger
reorganization. The notes are payable out of the proceeds of their participation
in the secondary offering. They will hold their restricted St. Ives Holding
stock for a short period of time before the public offering of St. Ives Holding
stock, and they will hold unregistered St. Ives Holding shares after the
offering.
All of the shareholders of St.
Ives Holding will sell some but not all of their St. Ives Holding shares in the
secondary portion of the registered public offering of St. Ives Holding stock;
thus all shareholders, as previously stated, will retain amounts of restricted
unregistered St. Ives Holding stock after the offering. It is the resale
restrictions on this remaining St. Ives Holding stock to which this letter
relates.
5. Analysis of Resale
Restrictions
Based upon conversations with
the Staff of the Commission, our review of Sections 2(11), 4(1) and 3(a)(10) of
the Act, Rule 145 (c), (d)(i) (in addition to certain Releases and a no action
letter cited infra.) and considering that the merger reorganization in
which St. Ives and Cosmetic corporations will become subsidiaries of St. Ives
Holding corporation is effectuated in reliance on Section 3(a) (10) of the Act,
it is our view that the shareholders of St. Ives Holding may sell their
restricted St. Ives Holding corporation unregistered stock after the public
offering pursuant to Rule 145 (d)(1), which incorporates paragraph (c), (e), (f)
and (g) of Rule 144, but excludes paragraph (d) relating to holding periods.
Thus all St. Ives Holding shareholders would be able to utilize the provisions
of Rule 144 90 days after the public information requirements of such Rule were
met if, of course, the volume and nature of sale limitations of the Rule were
observed. In addition to our analysis of Sections 2(11), 3(a)(10) and 4(1) of
the Act, we have reviewed Commission Releases 33-6508 (at footnote 1) and
33-6099 (Interpretative Question No. 87), which state that resales by
shareholders who are affiliates before and after a Rule 145 transaction effected
in reliance on Section 3(a)(10) may sell their restricted unregistered shares
pursuant to Rule 145 (d)(1). Interpretative Question No. 87 seems squarely to
resolve the issue since the St. Ives Holding shares will be issued relying on
the Section 3(a)(10). Release 33-6508, in footnote 1, states the applicability
of Rule 145(d)(1) to persons who are affiliates before and after a Rule 145
transaction. As additional analytical support for the position stated, we draw
your attention to the letter from the Division of Corporation Finance dated
November 17, 1977 (Ward Foods, Inc., avail. 12/19/79) treating what appears to
be a similar factual situation and reaching the same conclusion.
We respectfully request the
Staff of the Commission to advise that, on the basis of the facts stated herein,
it will not recommend to the Commission that enforcement action be taken if
shares of the restricted unregistered common stock of St. Ives Holding
corporation received upon conversion in the merger reorganization effectuated
pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) are sold in reliance upon Rule 145(d)(1) and Rule
144(c)(e),(f) and (g), after the public offering of St. Ives Holding shares.
It is expected that the
proposed exchange reorganization will be completed in mid May, 1987.
Accordingly, we would greatly appreciate a timely reply to this letter. If the
staff desires additional information please contact the undersigned or Chris A.
Christopher, Jr. of this office by telephone. If an unfavorable reply on any of
the matters discussed herein is being considered, we would request the
opportunity for a prior conference with the Staff.
Very truly yours,
FREDERICK W. LAMBERT
STAFF REPLY LETTER
July 22, 1987
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL
DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE
St. Ives Holding Company, Inc. (the "Company") Incoming letter dated April 13,
1987
You have requested that the
Division take a no-action position with respect to the resale of the Companys
shares in conformity with your opinion. While the Division does not normally
issue no-action letters with respect to transactions under Rules 144 and 145
under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"), your letter presents
interpretative issues to which we will respond.
The Division is of the view
that the Company stock received by affiliates of St. Ives Laboratories, Inc.
("St. Ives") and Cosmetic Laboratories, Inc. ("Cosmetic") in exchange for their
shares of St. Ives and Cosmetic stock may be resold in the manner permitted by
Rule 145. The Company stock received in the exchange will not be deemed
"restricted" pursuant to Rule 144(a)(3). Accordingly, such affiliates, who are
persons described in Rule 145(c), may resell the shares received in the exchange
in the manner permitted by Rule 145(d)(1) without regard to the holding period
required by Rule 144(d). In computing the holding period of Company stock for
purposes of Rule 145(d)(2) or (3), however, such persons may not "tack" the
holding period of their St. Ives or Cosmetic stock.
Because these positions are
based on the representations contained in your letter, particularly your
representations that the merger of St. Ives and Cosmetic into the Company is
exempt from 1933 Act registration under Section 3(a)(10), it should be noted
that different facts and conditions might necessitate a different conclusion.
Sincerely,
Kenneth L. Wagner
Special Counsel
|