Company Name: Cravath, Swaine & Moore
Sales of Convertible Securities Under Regulation S
Public Availability Date: Aug. 26, 1998
[LETTER OF INQUIRY]
August 24,
1998
Sales of Convertible Securities
Of U.S. Reporting Companies
Under Regulation S
Ladies and
Gentlemen:
We are
writing to request that the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") confirm that it will not recommend enforcement action to the
Commission if convertible securities of U.S. reporting companies are offered and
resold under the conditions described below without implementation of the
stop-transfer provisions or other procedures under
Rule 903(b)(3)(iii)(B)(4)
of Regulation S.
Introduction
Overview of Convertible Securities Market. The market for convertible
securities of U.S. reporting companies is large and involves a broad
cross-section of issuers. A significant portion of these securities is sold
every year in private offerings under Rule 144A, most of which include a tranche
of securities issued under Regulation S. For example, in 1997 an estimated $17
billion of convertible securities were sold by U.S. reporting companies in
transactions under Rule 144A and Regulation S, constituting approximately 55% of
all sales of convertible securities in that year by U.S. reporting companies. In
the first quarter of 1998, approximately $6 billion of convertible securities
were sold in such transactions, which constituted approximately 47% of all sales
of convertible securities by U.S. reporting companies in that quarter.
The
issuers in these transactions include large, widely followed companies such as
Hewlett Packard, Banc One Corporation and Union Pacific Corporation as well as
smaller companies. Virtually every major U.S. investment bank participates in
the distribution of these securities. The purchasers of these securities are
predominantly institutional, both in the United States and overseas. Unlike
certain transactions identified by the Commission, these transactions do not
involve the fraudulent or abusive practices cited by the Commission in
Securities Act
Release No. 7392 (February 20, 1997). The average conversion
premium for these offerings was well above the 10% threshold required under Rule
144A.
Issuers
that are U.S. public reporting companies may choose to sell convertible
securities in private or offshore offerings for a variety of reasons. First,
many issuers either do not have sufficient capacity under their shelf
registrations or have chosen not to include convertible securities or common
stock under those shelf registrations because of concern over the effect of the
"overhang" of shelf-registered common stock on the trading price of that stock.
Second, private offerings can be executed quickly, allowing issuers to take
advantage of short-lived market "windows". Third, a significant number of these
transactions has involved highly structured instruments issued by trusts or
limited liability companies that are wholly owned by the issuer of the equity
but are not themselves registrants under the issuers shelf registration
statements.
Compliance with Amended Regulation S. Securities sold in the
Euromarkets, including convertible securities, are customarily held in global
form and traded through book-entry clearance facilities such as the Euroclear
System ("Euroclear"), Cedel Bank or The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"). These
systems currently do not have facilities that allow participants to obtain
transaction-by-transaction representations or certifications of non-U.S. status
from purchasers. The only way to obtain such certifications is to require
securities to be held as definitive registered securities, which is costly,
imposes additional settlement risks and, we believe, is not necessary in order
to achieve the policy goals of Regulation S.
Rule
903(b)(3)(iii)(B)(4) ("Paragraph (B)(4)") under Regulation S
requires an issuer, "by contract or a provision in its by-laws, articles,
charter or comparable document, to refuse to register any transfer of securities
not made in accordance with [the registration or exemptive provisions of the
Securities Act]." The Commission noted in Securities Act
Release No. 33-7505
(Feb. 17, 1998) (the "1998 Adopting Release"), that "these requirements will not
be complied with easily in an offshore public offering" (1998 Adopting Release).
Indeed, Paragraph (B)(4) itself recognizes that in the case of bearer
securities (and certain other cases), alternative procedures reasonably designed
to achieve the underlying purpose of Regulation S may be appropriate, as it
provides that "if the securities are in bearer form or foreign law prevents the
issuer of the securities from refusing to register securities transfers, other
reasonable procedures (such as a legend described in
paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(B)(3)
of this section) may be implemented to prevent any transfer of the securities
not made in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation S".
We believe
that Paragraph (B)(4) was not intended to disrupt the practice of holding
securities in global form through depositories such as the DTC, Euroclear or
Cedel Bank, especially in the case of convertible securities meeting the
requirements of Rule 144A, so long as reasonable procedures exist to ensure that
such securities will not flow back into the U.S. market in violation of the
Securities Act.
Issuers
and investment banks are concerned that if U.S. reporting companies are required
to issue convertible securities outside the United States in the form of
physical definitive certificates, it would be a serious impediment to the
ability of U.S. issuers and other distribution participants to effect offerings
of convertible securities in reliance on Regulation S because non-U.S. investors
strongly favor holding securities through book-entry systems and will not want
to bear the costs, administrative burden and added settlement risk of being
required to deliver physical securities and certifications of compliance upon
each transfer. 1
Proposed Procedures for Convertible Securities
In order to address the issues outlined above, we request that the staff
confirm that it will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission for
failure to comply with
Paragraph (B)(4) if issuers and other distribution participants
implement the following procedures with respect to convertible securities of
U.S. reporting companies that meet the requirements of Rule 144A and maintain
such procedures in effect for the duration of the distribution compliance period
applicable under Rule 903 2:
Securities Held in Global Form. Convertible securities issued pursuant
to Regulation S may be held in global certificated registered or bearer form by
a depository for a book-entry clearance facility such as DTC, Euroclear and
Cedel Bank. 3 Offshore purchasers will hold interests in the global
security through direct or indirect participants in such facilities, including
other offshore book-entry clearance facilities.
Restricted Identifier. Both the securities sold under Regulation S and
those sold under Rule 144A will be identified in the records maintained by
entities such as the CUSIP Bureau ("CUSIP") as restricted under the Securities
Act. CUSIP and other similar entities assign a number to each security that
identifies the issuer and each outstanding security of that issuer. Each number
has an associated security description, which includes an indication that such
securities are subject to Rule 144A and/or Regulation S or otherwise that such
securities are subject to restrictions under the Securities Act, so that
participants in book entry clearance facilities and others that trade the
securities will be aware that transfers of the securities to purchasers in the
United States are restricted and must qualify under an available exemption.
4 In addition, any statement or communication confirming or summarizing
the terms of any new issuance of such securities by the issuer or managing
underwriters to publishers of publicly available databases will include a
statement that such securities have not been registered under the Securities Act
and are subject to Rule 144A and/or Regulation S. 5
Deemed Representations. The offering circular will set forth
representations of non-U.S. or QIB status (or other applicable exceptions) and
the agreements regarding restrictions on resale and hedging pursuant to
Regulation S (and, where appropriate, Rule 144A) that purchasers from issuers,
distributors or their affiliates are deemed to make.
Restrictive Legends; Certifications. Any certificated securities,
including both global securities and any physical certificated securities issued
to holders prior to the expiration of the distribution compliance period, will
bear a restrictive legend. Thereafter such certificated securities will bear a
restrictive legend to the extent required by Rule 144. In addition, any
definitive securities issued during the distribution compliance period (other
than in a transaction subject to Rule 144A) will satisfy all the requirements of
(B)(4), including the legending and certification requirements.
If you
have any questions or require additional information with respect to the matters
discussed herein, please call the undersigned at (212) 474-1270 or Andrew J.
Pitts at (212) 474-1620. Seven additional copies of this letter are enclosed.
Very truly
yours,
William P.
Rogers, Jr.
Division
of Corporation Finance
Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth
Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549
Encls.
[STAFF REPLY LETTER]
August 26,
1998
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE FINANCE
DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE
Re: Sales
of Convertible Securities of U.S. Reporting Companies Under Regulation S
Incoming
letter dated August 24, 1998
Based on
the facts presented, the Division will not recommend enforcement action to the
Commission if convertible securities of U.S. reporting companies that are
eligible for resale under Rule 144A and that are held in global certificated
form (as either registered or bearer securities) by a depository for a
book-entry clearance facility are offered and resold pursuant to Regulation S
without implementation of the stop-transfer provisions or other procedures set
forth under
Rule 903(b)(3)(iii)(B)(4) of Regulation S, provided that
during the applicable distribution compliance period:
(1) the
convertible securities are identified by its CUSIP or other issuer
identification number as restricted, so that participants in book-entry
clearance facilities and others that trade the securities will have notice that
transfers of the securities to U.S. purchasers are restricted and must qualify
under an available exemption (absent registration);
(2) any
information provided by the issuer or managing underwriters to publishers of
publicly available databases about the terms of any new issuance of convertible
securities includes a statement that the securities have not been registered
under the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and are subject to
restrictions under Rule 144A and/or Regulation S;
(3) the
offering circular used in the Regulation S offering of the convertible
securities contains representations deemed to be made by purchasers in the
offering regarding their non-U.S. status (or other exempt status, such as
qualified institutional buyer status under the Rule 144A exemption from
registration), and contains agreements deemed to be made by purchasers under
Regulation S (and, where appropriate, Rule 144A) regarding restrictions on
resale and hedging; and
(4) any
certificated securities, including both global securities and any physical,
certificated securities issued to holders prior to the expiration of the
distribution compliance period, bear an appropriate restrictive legend.
Thereafter these certificated securities will bear a restrictive legend to the
extent required by Rule 144. Any definitive securities that are issued during
the distribution compliance period (other than in a transaction subject to Rule
144A) must satisfy all of the requirements of
Rule 903(b)(3)(iii)(B)(4),
including the legending and certification requirements.
Our view is limited to convertible securities offered or resold under
Regulation S, and does not affect the applicability of
Rule 903(b)(3)(iii)(B)(4) to any equity
securities that are issued upon the conversion of the convertible securities
during the distribution compliance period. Debt securities that are convertible
into equity securities of a person other than the issuer would, in our view,
also be considered convertible securities for purposes of Regulation S.
Because
these positions are based on the representations set forth in your letter, it
should be noted that any different facts or conditions might require a different
conclusion. Furthermore, this response represents the Divisions position as to
enforcement action, and does not express any legal conclusions with respect to
the specific questions presented.
Sincerely,
Felicia H.
Kung
Special
Counsel
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
1We
note that the 1998 Adopting Release specifically permits the use of
notices to investors, the use of global securities, and the use of
restricted CUSIP numbers to satisfy the legending requirements of Rule
903(b)(3)(iii)(B)(3) (1998 Adopting Release, footnote 31).
Unfortunately, the 1998 Adopting Release does not go on to specify that
these steps will also satisfy the monitoring requirements of Paragraph
(B)(4).
2The
relief requested herein is limited to convertible securities and does
not affect the application of Paragraph (B)(4) to any equity
securities issued upon the conversion of convertible securities during
the distribution compliance period. It is our view that debt securities
convertible into equity securities of a person other than the issuer
(commonly referred to as "exchangeable" securities) should be understood
to constitute "convertible" securities for purposes of Regulation S.
3The
requirement that securities be held in global form will be subject to
customary exceptions such as the unwillingness of the depository to
continue in such capacity. As described below, if such definitive
(non-global) registered securities are issued during the distribution
compliance period, they would bear a legend and be subject to
appropriate certification requirements upon transfer. In addition, for
tax reasons holders of interests in a global bearer security have
customarily been able to obtain definitive securities in smaller
denominations upon request, although in practice this has rarely
occurred. If definitive (non-global) bearer securities are issued in
definitive form, the requirements of Paragraph (B)(4) would be
applicable.
4In
cases where the security trades offshore the CUSIP number is referred to
as an ISIN number. In cases where the security is sold both pursuant to
Rule 144A and Regulation S it may be assigned a single number
identifying the security as a Rule 144A security when it trades in the
United States. CUSIP publishes each number and identifying description
in the CUSIP Directory, in the case of CUSIP numbers and the
International Securities Identification Directory (the "ISID"), in the
case of ISIN numbers. The CUSIP and ISID databases, including the
information identifying the securities as restricted, are licensed to
all the major providers of securities trading software, ensuring that
the security description will be used to identify securities on a
traders screen as well as at the clearing agency for the trade.
5It
is our understanding that after the issuer and underwriters agree to the
terms of a proposed offering, underwriters confirm to providers of
financial databases (e.g., Bloomberg) pertinent information regarding
the subject securities including, in the case of convertible securities,
CUSIP and/or ISIN number, issue price, underwriting discount, coupon,
interest payment dates, maturity date, conversion premium and whether
the securities were registered under the Securities Act or are being
sold in reliance on Rule 144A and/or Regulation S. We have been advised
by Bloomberg, for example, that it includes all information confirmed to
it in its securities listings, and Bloomberg data "screens" for Rule
144A/Regulation S securities currently include legends indicating that
such securities have not been registered under the Securities Act.
Because issuers and underwriters do not contract directly with financial
database providers (other than as purchasers of database products), it
would not be feasible to mandate that issuers or underwriters require
database providers to include restricted security legends.
|