Company Name: Bourns. Inc.
Public Availability Date: Jan. 28, 1974
SEC Staff Response Letter
December 27, 1973
William L. Yerkes, Esq.
Kindel & Anderson
Twenty-Sixth Floor
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
Re: Bourns, Inc.
Dear Mr. Yerkes:
This is in response to your letter of September 20, 1973 concerning the
determination for purposes of Rule 144(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of the holding period for restricted securities purchased by employees
of Bourns, Inc. ("Bourns") under a Restricted Stock Plan ("the Bourns Plan")
designed to qualify under Section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
amended. You refer to your previous letter of December 6, 1972 on this subject
and to our response dated January 23, 1973. You note
apparent inconsistencies in staff treatment of the Bourns Plan and other similar
plans and request reconsideration of the staff position with respect to the
holding period applicable to the Bourns Plan.
The Bourns Plan provides that
shares of common stock of Bourns, Inc. may be purchased by certain key employees
at not less than $1.00 per share. Shares purchased by an employee under the
Bourns Plan may not be transferred, sold or hypothecated for three years. These
restrictions lapse as to one fifth of the shares upon expiration of each of the
third through seventh years following purchase. If the employee's employment is
terminated within three years after purchase of the shares for reasons other
than death, disability or retirement, Bourns has the option for 30 days after
termination to repurchase the shares at the employee's cost plus interest. If
employment is terminated in the fourth through the seventh year other than for
the aforementioned reasons, Bourns has the same option as to any shares still
subject to the transfer restrictions. During the period in which transfer is
restricted, the employee is entitled to vote the shares and receive any
dividends declared thereon.
The staff has reviewed the
positions taken with respect to the Rule 144 holding period applicable to the
Bourns Plan and other similar plans designed to qualify under Section 83 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
We have concluded that the two
year holding period for stock purchased under such plans does not begin to run
as to each portion of the shares until the restrictions on disposition by the
purchaser on that portion of the shares has been lifted.
The general rule as to the
holding period for restricted securities under Rule 144, subparagraph 144(d)(1),
requires that "if the securities were purchased, the full purchase price or
other consideration shall have been paid or given at least two years prior to
the sale. . ." Section 83 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that tax
liabilities for transferred property may be deferred so long as the rights in
such property are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Section 83(c)(1)
of the Code defines substantial risk of forfeiture as a conditioning of rights
in property "upon the future performance of substantial services by any
individual." Read in light of Section 83 your view that the holding period for
the Bourns Plan begins to run at the time of purchase requires adopting the
position that the holding period under Rule 144 can begin to run when additional
consideration - i.e. "the future performance of substantial services" remains to
be given for the stock. The staff believes such a position would be inconsistent
with the plain meaning of subparagraph 144(d)(1).
Since the restrictions on
disposition of the stock purchased under the Bourns Plan are not to be lifted as
to each portion of the shares until additional consideration is forthcoming, the
holding period for purposes of Rule 144 for stock purchased under the Bourns
Plan will begin to run as to such portions only when full consideration has been
provided by the purchaser as evidenced by the lifting of the restrictions.
Sincerely,
Neal S. McCoy
Chief Counsel
Incoming Letter
KINDEL &
ANDERSON
TWENTY-SIXTH
FLOOR, 555 SOUTH FLOWER STREET
LOS ANGELES,
CALIFORNIA 90071
(213) 680-2222
September 20, 1973
2348-00-02
Securities and Exchange Commission
500 North Capitol Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attention: Mr. J. Rowland Cook
Re: BOURNS, INC. -
Restricted Stock Plan
Gentlemen:
I am writing to request that the staff reconsider the position taken in its
letter of January 23, 1973 in response to our letter of December 6, 1972. Copies
of both letters and a copy of Bourns' Restricted Stock Plan are enclosed.
In our letter of December 6,
1972 we asked whether under Rule 144(d) the holding period for shares purchased
by an employee under Bourns' Restricted Stock Plan would begin with payment for
the shares or with the lapse of the transfer restrictions contained in the Plan.
We submitted that, for several reasons, it would be more appropriate to conclude
that the holding period would commence with payment. The staff, however,
indicated that the holding period would begin at the start of the fourth year
after the purchase, that being the time at which the transfer restrictions begin
to lapse. The staff quoted the portion of Securities Act Release No. 5223 which
indicates that the holding period requirement is designed to avoid circumvention
of the registration provisions of the Act by persons acting as conduits for an
issuer in connection with resales and that must be subject to the full economic
risks of investment during the holding period.
This request is prompted by the
fact that on July 16, 1973, the staff issued an interpretive letter (available
August 15, 1973) indicating that with regard to the Key Employees Restricted
Stock Plan of Warner Communications, Inc., the holding period would begin to run
at the time the stock is acquired rather than the date on which transfer
restrictions lapse. While we have not seen that Plan, it appears from the
correspondence that in many respects it is similar to Bourns', the principal
difference apparently being that under certain circumstances Bourns has the
option to repurchase an employee's shares. Also, for convenience, Bourns has
retained custody of the stock certificates, but it would be willing to change
this practice.
We respectfully submit, and
would ask that the staff now concur, that for purposes of Rule 144(d), the
holding period for shares purchased pursuant to Bourns' Restricted Stock Plan
commences on the date of purchase. We believe that it is clear that employees
acquiring shares under the Plan will not be acting as conduits for Bourns in
connection with resales. There is an absolute prohibition on transfers for three
years and the restrictions lapse as to one fifth of the shares over each of the
next five years. Repurchase is optional on the part of Bourns. The employee thus
is not assured of getting his money back and will have subjected himself to the
economic risk of investment. On the other hand, the employee obtains significant
attributes of beneficial ownership immediately upon purchase in that he can vote
the shares and receive dividends; moreover, Bourns does not have the repurchase
option if termination is occasioned by death, disability or retirement. For
additional factors supporting our conclusion, we refer to our letter of December
6, 1972.
As Bourns soon will have to
decide whether it should register certain shares which have been issued under
the Plan, your early response to this letter would be appreciated. If additional
information is needed, please feel free to contact me by telephone collect at
(213) 680-2222.
Very truly yours,
William L. Yerkes
of KINDEL & ANDERSON
[
|