Bottom

Print Add to favorites
 

Company Name: American Bar Association (ABA)
Public Availability Date: 02-14-1989

INQUIRY LETTER

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
750 NORTH LAKE SHORE DRIVE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60611
TELEPHONE(312) 988-5588

November 23, 1988

Securities Act of 1933 -- Form S-8

William E. Morley, Esq.
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Mr. Morley:

On behalf of the Federal Regulation of Securities Committee Subcommittee on Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation of the American Bar Association's Section of Business Law, I am writing to request the staff's views on an issue of general interest relating to the use of Form S-8. Specifically, the Subcommittee would like the staff to confirm that when an issuer uses Form S-8 to register shares issuable pursuant to non-transferable stock options granted to employees pursuant to an employee benefits plan, Form S-8 will continue to be available for the sale of shares upon exercise of such options notwithstanding the fact that the employment of an option holder may have terminated before the options are exercised.

Virtually all employee stock options provide for continued exercisability for some period of time after retirement or death, and most provide for exercisability following other termination of employment. The period of such continued exercisability varies from plan to plan, and even from option to option, depending on a number of factors. For example, a concern over short-term volatility in stock prices and a sense that employee efforts are often reflected only in long-term stock-price trends have led many companies to conclude that the personal efforts stock options are intended to encourage may not bear fruit in the form of enhanced share value until well beyond termination of an employee's service to the company. Other companies have been concerned about the impact termination of employment could have on employees' financial planning and, in today's climate of business restructurings, the often arbitrary treatment afforded employees whose employment is terminated as a result of the reorganization, discontinuance or sale of a portion of a company's business. As a result, many plans now permit continued exercisability of stock options for significant periods of time after termination of employment.

Public policy has long favored the use of stock options as a compensation device. Form S-8 promotes that policy by providing an efficient and relatively inexpensive method for issuers to satisfy the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The Subcommittee believes that public policy is similarly served by continuing the availability of Form S-8 for sales to option holders whose employment with the issuer has terminated. The alternative of requiring an issuer to establish and maintain a second registration statement on another form would be burdensome both in terms of cost and the administrative difficulties attendent to maintaining the "evergreen" status of another registration statement. Whether or not an optionee is an employee, he or she would, of course, continue to receive all of the shareholder materials provided for in the Form S-8 undertakings.

In the Boulevard Bancorp. Inc. no-action letter (avail. Nov. 6, 1987), the staff indicated that Form S-8 would be available for the exercise of transferable warrants for a period of 90 days after termination of the warrant holder's employment. The Subcommittee is of the view that the implied 90-day limitation in the Boulevard Bancorp. letter should not be extended to non-transferable stock options granted, pursuant to employee stock plans. When a company issues freely transferable warrants, it makes an implicit undertaking to register the underlying shares on a form other than Form S-8 when the warrants are transferred to non-employees. No such implicit undertaking is present when non-transferable stock options are granted since only employees (or their estates or beneficiaries) are permitted to exercise non-transferable options.

In the Boulevard Bancorp. letter, the staff recognizes, at least implicitly, that the language of Form S-8 does not prevent the use of that Form to issue shares to former as well as current employees. The question is whether as a policy matter the staff, in interpreting the Form, should impose a time limit on its use following termination of an optionee's employment. In light of the substantial variations in practice in this area and the need for companies to have flexibility in their treatment of terminated employees, the Subcommittee would urge the staff not to impose any such limit, at least in the case of non-transferable options granted under employee benefit plans to option recipients who were employees when the options were awarded. This result is consistent with the approach adopted by the Commission earlier this year in Rule 701, which provides an exemption for offers and sales of shares upon exercise of non-transferable employee stock options without regard to whether the optionee continues to be an employee at the time of exercise.

The Subcommittee, therefore, hereby requests that the staff confirm that Form S-8 will continue to be available for sales of shares upon exercise of non-transferable options granted to employees pursuant to stock options plans, even though at the time of exercise the option holder may no longer be an employee of the issuer.

If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter with the undersigned (617-423-6100) or other members of the Subcommittee, please let me know. I would appreciate it if you would send a copy of your reply to me at my office (c/o Ropes & Gray, 225 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110).

Sincerely,

Donald W. Glazer
Co-chairman, Subcommittee
on Employee Benefits
and Executive
Compensation.

Enclosures

STAFF REPLY LETTER

February 14, 1989

Donald W. Glazer, Esq.
Co-Chairman, Subcommittee on Employee
Benefits and Executive Compensation
American Bar Association
c/o Ropes & Gray
225 Franklin Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02110

Dear Mr. Glazer:

This is in response to your letter of November 23, 1988 concerning the availability of the Form S-8 registration statement for certain exercises of stock options.

It is the Division's view that Form S-8 is available for the sale of an issuer's securities upon the exercise of non-transferable stock options granted to employees pursuant to an employee benefit plan notwithstanding the fact that the employment of the option holder may have terminated before the options are exercised. Our view in this regard is conditioned upon the fact that the exercise will be pursuant to the terms of an employee stock option plan that specifically provides for the continued exercisability of the options for a period of time after retirement, death or other termination of employment.

Sincerely,

William E. Morley
Chief Counsel
Associate Director (Legal)

Top


Clear Gif