Company Name:NYSE Euronext
Public Availability Date: January 16, 2008
Document Sections:
INQUIRY LETTER
INQUIRY LETTER
APPENDIX
STAFF REPLY LETTER
[INQUIRY LETTER]
January 15, 2008
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND E-MAIL (CFLETTERS@SEC.GOV)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Chief Counsel
100 F. Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: NYSE Euronext Commission File No. 001-33392 Withdrawal of Shareholder
Proposal - Rule 14a-8
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Under cover of my letter dated December 28, 2007, I requested that the staff of
the Division of Corporation Finance confirm that NYSE Euronext may omit from its
2008 proxy materials a shareholder proposal submitted by Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis on
September 17, 2007.
Please be advised that Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis has withdrawn her proposal on the
terms and conditions of the letter agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Accordingly, NYSE Euronext withdraws its request for such confirmation.
Enclosed herewith are six copies of this letter and of the letter Agreement
attached hereto marked as Exhibit A. One copy of this letter and of Exhibit A is
being sent to Mrs. Davis.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the foregoing, please
contact the undersigned at (212) 656-5932.
Very truly yours,
/s/
Enclosures
cc: Rachel F. Robbins
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis
Highlights and Lowlights
Watergate Office Building - Suite 215
2600 Virginia Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
[INQUIRY LETTER]
December 28, 2007
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS AND E-MAIL (CFLETTERS@SEC.GOV)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Chief Counsel
100 F. Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re: NYSE Euronext Commission File No. 001-33392 Omission of Shareholder Proposal
- Rule 14a-8
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule 14a-8(j) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the "Exchange Act"), NYSE Euronext (the "Company") hereby gives notice of its
intention to omit from its proxy statement for the Company's 2008 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders ("Annual Meeting" a proposal (the "Proposal") submitted by Mrs.
Evelyn Davis by letter dated September 17, 2007, and received by the Company on
September 17, 2007.
The Proposal requests "[t]hat the Board of Directors take the necessary steps so
that NO future NEW stock options are awarded to senior executive officers, nor
any current stock options are repriced or renewed (unless there was a contract
to do so on some)." As set forth in more detail below, the Company proposes to
exclude the Proposal from its 2008 proxy materials under Rule 14a-8(i)(9). We
hereby request confirmation that the staff of the Division of Corporation
Finance (the "Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") will not recommend enforcement action if, in reliance on Rule
14a-8(i)(9), the Company omits the Proposal from its 2008 proxy materials.
Pursuant to Rule 14a-8(j) under the Exchange Act, enclosed herewith are six
copies of the Proposal, marked as Exhibit A. Further enclosed pursuant to Rule
14a-8(j) are six copies of this letter. By copy of this letter and accompanying
material, the Company is notifying Mrs. Davis, pursuant to Rule 14a-8(j), of its
intention to omit the Proposal from its 2008 proxy materials.
The Proposal directly conflicts with a Company proposal.
Rule 14a-8(i)(9) permits companies to exclude a shareholder proposal that
"directly conflicts with one of the company's own proposals to be submitted to
shareholders at the same meeting." The Company intends to propose at the 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders that the stockholders ratify the adoption of the
NYSE Euronext 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan").
The purpose of the Plan is to enable the Company to offer "Eligible Employees
and Non-Employee Directors stock-based incentives in the Company to attract,
retain and reward such individuals and strengthen the mutuality of interests
between such individuals and the Company's stockholders." The Plan is
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
Compensation Committee consists of five directors, each of whom is (1) an
"independent director" within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the New York
Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual and (2) a "non-employee director" within
the meaning of Rule 16b-3(b)(3)(i) under the Exchange Act. Subject to certain
limitations on the number of shares that may underlie awards under the Plan, the
Compensation Committee has plenary authority to determine the nature and amount
of equity incentive awards, including stock options, to be awarded to employees,
including senior executives, and non-employee directors of the Company.
We believe that the Proposal and the Company's proposal to ratify the Plan
present alternative and conflicting decisions for the stockholders, and that
submitting both proposals to a vote could provide inconsistent and ambiguous
results. In the release implementing the current form of Rule 14a-8, the
Commission noted that the Rule 14a-9 exclusion does not require that "proposals
must be identical in scope or focus for the exclusion to be available."
The Staff has repeatedly allowed companies to omit from their proxy materials,
in reliance on Rule 14a-8(i)(9), proposals to eliminate stock option
compensation to directors and/or senior officers, at meetings where the company
proposes adoption or ratification of a stock incentive plan.
In Crown Holdings, Inc. (Feb. 4, 2004) the Staff permitted the omission of a
proposal requesting the board and management to "consider discontinuing all
rights, options, SARs and possible severance payments to top 5 of Management
after expiration of existing plans or commitments."
In Goodrich Corporation (Jan. 27, 2004), the Staff permitted omission of a
resolution requesting the compensation committee to "utilize performance and
time-based restricted share programs in lieu of stock options."
In Time Warner Inc. (Mar. 3, 2003), the Staff permitted omission of a
resolution urging the board to "adopt a policy prohibiting future stock option
grants to senior executives."
In Baxter International Inc. (Jan. 6, 2003), the Staff permitted omission of a
resolution urging the board to "adopt a policy prohibiting future stock option
grants to senior executives."
In Croghan Bancshares, Inc. (Mar. 13, 2002), the Staff permitted omission of a
proposal requesting the Board "not to include individual Directors in any stock
option and incentive Plan."
In First Niagara Financial Group, Inc. (Jan. 3, 2002), the Staff permitted
omission of a proposal intended to end issuance of stock options to executive
officers.
Action Requested
The Company believes that it may properly omit the Proposal from its 2008 proxy
materials pursuant to Rules 14a-8(i)(9) for the reasons set forth above. The
Company hereby respectfully requests confirmation that the Staff will not
recommend enforcement action if the Company so omits the Proposal in reliance on
such provision. If the Staff disagrees with the Company's conclusion that the
Proposal may be so omitted from its 2008 proxy materials, the Company requests
the opportunity to confer with the Staff prior to the issuance of its position.
In addition, the Company would be pleased to provide the Commission with such
further information regarding the matters that are the subject of the Proposal
as the Staff may request.
We would greatly appreciate your prompt reply. We intend to mail our proxy
materials on or around April 15, 2007, and, if we choose to follow the notice
and access method in part, to post our proxy materials on an appropriate website
on or about April 1, 2008.
* * *
Should you have any questions or comments regarding the foregoing, please
contact the undersigned at (212) 656-5932. Please acknowledge receipt of this
letter and enclosures by stamping the enclosed additional copy of this letter
and returning it in the attached stamped reply envelope.
Very truly yours,
Enclosures
cc: Rachel F. Robbins
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis
Highlights and Lowlights
Watergate Office Building - Suite 215
2600 Virginia Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
[APPENDIX]
Exhibit A
Letter dated September 17, 2007
EVELYN Y. DAVIS
Editor
HIGHLIGHTS AND LOWLIGHTS
Watergate Office Building - Suite 215
2600 Virginia Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037
September 17, 07
John Thain, CEO
NY STOCK EXCHANGE Euronext
11 Wall Street, NYC 10005
Dear John:
This is a formal notice to the management of NYSTOCK EXCHANGE Euronext that Mrs
Evelyn Y. Davis who is the owner of 200 shares of common stock plans to
introduce the following resolution at the forthcoming Annual Meeting of 2008. I
ask that my name and address be printed in the proxy statement, together with
the text of the resolution and reasons for its introduction. I also ask that the
substance of the resolution be included in the notice of the meeting:
RESOLVED: "That the Board of Directors take the necessary steps so that NO
future NEW stock options are awarded to senior executive officers, nor any
current stock options are repriced or renewed (unless there was a contract to do
so on some)."
REASONS: "stock option awards have gotten out of hand in recent years, and some
analysts MIGHT inflate earnings estimates, because earnings affect stock prices
and stock options."
"There are other ways to "reward" senior executive officers, including giving
them actual STOCK instead of options.
"Recent scandals involving CERTAIN financial institutions have pointed out how
analysts can manipulate earnings estimates and stock prices."
"If you AGREE, please vote YOUR proxy FOR this resolution."
Sincerely.
/s/ Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis
CC: SEC in D.C.
John: Please acknowledge receipt of this resolution YOURSELF!!!
[STAFF REPLY LETTER]
January 16, 2008
Cornelius M. Courtney
Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
NYSE Euronext
11 Wall St.
New York, NY 10005
Re: NYSE Euronext
Dear Mr. Courtney:
This is in regard to your letter dated January 15, 2008 concerning the
shareholder proposal submitted by Evelyn Y. Davis for inclusion in NYSE
Euronext's proxy materials for its upcoming annual meeting of security holders.
Your letter indicates that the proponent has withdrawn the proposal, and that
NYSE Euronext therefore withdraws its December 28, 2007 request for a no-action
letter from the Division. Because the matter is now moot, we will have no
further comment.
Sincerely,
/s/
William A. Hines
Special Counsel
cc: Evelyn Y. Davis
Watergate Office Building - Suite 215
2600 Virginia Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
|