Company Name: Becton, Dickinson and Co.
Public Availability Date: October 31, 2007
Document Sections:
INQUIRY LETTER
INQUIRY LETTER
APPENDIX
INQUIRY LETTER
STAFF REPLY LETTER
[INQUIRY LETTER]
September 27, 2007
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Chief Counsel
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Dear Sir or Madam:
In accordance with Rule 14a-8(j) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, Becton, Dickinson and Company, a New Jersey corporation ("BD"), is
filing this letter with respect to a certain shareholder proposal and supporting
statement (the "Proposal") (a copy of which, together with subsequent
correspondence between the Proponent and BD, is attached hereto as Appendix A)
submitted by Kenneth Steiner (the "Proponent") on June 29, 2007 for inclusion in
the proxy materials BD intends to distribute in connection with its 2008 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders (the "2008 Proxy Materials"). We hereby request
confirmation that the staff of the Office of Chief Counsel (the "Staff") will
not recommend any enforcement action if, in reliance on Rule 14a-8(i)(3), BD
excludes portions of the Proposal from its 2008 Proxy Materials. In the
alternative, we request that the Staff require the Proponent to revise the
Proposal to remove or revise the statements that violate the abovementioned
rule.
The Proposal
The Proposal requests that BD's Board of Directors "take the steps necessary, in
the most expeditious manner possible, to adopt annual election of each director.
This includes complete transition from the current staggered system to 100%
annual election of each director in one election cycle unless this is absolutely
impossible. Also to transition solely through direct action of our board if
feasible."
Statements of Reasons to Exclude
BD believes that certain supporting statements contained in the Proposal may
properly be excluded from its 2008 Proxy Materials because they are contrary to
Rule 14a-9, which prohibits false and misleading statements (Rule 14a-8(i)(3)).
The Staff has recognized that a proposal or portions of a proposal may properly
be excluded under Rule 14a-8(i)(3) as false or misleading because a factual
statement is materially false and misleading, or if a statement directly or
indirectly impugns a person's character, integrity or personal reputation
without foundation. See Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14B (September 15,
2004)|g|s|a|B.4.
The statements in question are framed in the context of the Proponent's
evaluation of BD's "overall corporate governance," and are among a litany of
items characterized in the aggregate as "deficiencies" in BD's corporate
governance practices. The statements in question could materially mislead
shareholders in that they suggest without any foundation there for that BD's
corporate governance practices are flawed and have resulted in directors whose
independence is questionable. In fact, BD has well-established strong governance
practices as demonstrated by BD's Corporate Governance Quotient ("CGQ"), a
corporate governance rating system provided by Institutional Shareholder
Services Inc. ("ISS"), a major proxy advisory firm, BD's CGQ Index Score as of
September 19, 2007 is better than that of 88.2% of S&P 500 companies, and its
Industry Score is better than that of 99% of companies in ISS's Health Care and
Equipment Services industry peer group.
We believe the statements in question should be properly excluded or revised.
The statements are as follows;
1) Four directors had potentially compromising non-director links to our
company:
Dr. Sommer
Mr. Anderson
Mr. Mecklenburg
Mr. Mahmoud
Such directors held 4 seats on our key board committees-Independence concern
This statement is vague and materially misleading because, as presented, it
could cause shareholders to conclude that the directors in question are not, in
fact, independent, and that BD's corporate governance practices have allowed
this situation to result. The Proponent neither identifies any of these
so-called "links" nor explains how they compromise the independence or
performance of the directors in question. The statement impugns the integrity of
the directors in question by suggesting that they are conflicted and incapable
of properly discharging their fiduciary duties as directors. While BD has made
detailed disclosures (several of which were voluntary) in its proxy statements
regarding relationships between BD and entities with which each of these
directors are, or were, affiliated, shareholders are left to guess as to those
relationships and which aspects of them the Proponent asserts are problematic.
Moreover, the Board's determination that each of these directors (including Dr.
Sommer commencing in fiscal year 2006) is independent indicated that such
relationships did not compromise such directors' independence.
2) Our company had no Independent Chairman. This was compounded by our Lead
Director having 20 years tenure-Independence concern.
This statement is vague, materially misleading and objectively false because it
suggests that Henry P. Becton, Jr., BD's current Lead Director, is not
independent solely by virtue of his longevity as a director, and further implies
that he has been the Lead Director for an excessive length of time. It also
impugns Mr. Becton's and the Board's integrity because it suggests that he has
been improperly selected as an independent Lead Director when he himself is not
(or may not be) independent, and (when read together with the statement
discussed above) was selected by other directors who themselves are not
independent. In fact, pursuant to BD's Corporate Governance Principles, the Lead
Director is selected by the independent directors (all of whom have been
determined by the Board to be so), and that selection is reviewed at least
annually by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, Mr.
Becton, who has been Lead Director only since 2005, has consistently been
determined by the Board to be independent.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, BD respectfully requests confirmation that the Staff
will not recommend any enforcement action if, in reliance on the foregoing, BD
excludes these statements from the Proposal in its 2008 Proxy Materials. In the
alternative, BD respectfully requests that the Staff require the Proponent to
revise the Proposal to remove or revise any statements that would violate Rule
14a-8(i)(3). If the Staff does not concur with BD's position, we would
appreciate an opportunity to confer with the Staff concerning these matters
prior to the issuance of its Rule 14a-8 response.
BD expects to file its definitive proxy materials with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on or about December 21, 2007.
Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 14a-8(j), this letter is being filed with the
Commission no later than 80 days before BD files its definitive 2007 Proxy
Materials. Accordingly, the Staff's prompt review of this request would be
greatly appreciated.
Pursuant to Rule 14a-8(j) and Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14C, we are enclosing
herewith six copies of each of this letter, the Proposal and correspondence with
the Proponent. A copy of this submission is being sent simultaneously to the
Proponent as notification of BD's intention to omit the statements in question
from the Proposal in its 2008 Proxy Materials. This letter constitutes BD's
statement of the reasons it deems the omission from the Proposal of the
statements in question to be proper.
Please call the undersigned at (201) 847-7102 if you should have any questions
or need additional information or as soon as a Staff response is available. I
also may be reached by e-mail at dean_j_paranicas@bd.com, or by fax at (201)
847-5583. Please acknowledge receipt of this filing by date-stamping the
enclosed additional copy of this letter and returning it in the enclosed mailing
packet.
Respectfully yours,
/s/
Dean J. Paranicas
Vice President,
Corporate Secretary and Public Policy
Attachments
cc w/ att: Kenneth Steiner
John Chevedden
[INQUIRY LETTER]
Mr. Dean J. Paranicas
Corporate Secretary
Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX)
1 Becton Dr
Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417
Phone: 201 847-6800
Fax: 201 847-6475
Rule 14a-8 Proposal
Dear Mr. Paranicas.
This Rule 14a-8 proposal is respectfully submitted in support of the long-term
performance of our company. This proposal is submitted for the next annual
shareholder meeting. Rule 14a-8 requirements are intended to be met including
the continuous ownership of the required stock value until after the date of the
respective shareholder meeting and the presentation of the proposal at the
annual meeting. This submitted format, with the shareholder-supplied emphasis,
is intended to be used for definitive proxy publication. This is the proxy for
John Chevedden and/or his designee to act on my behalf regarding this Rule 14a-8
proposal for the forthcoming shareholder meeting before, during and after the
forthcoming shareholder meeting. Please direct all future communication to John
Chevedden at:
2215 Nelson Ave., No. 205
Redondo Beach, CA 90278
T: 310-371-7872
olmsted7p (at) earthlink.net
(In the interest of saving company expenses please communicate via email.)
Your consideration and the consideration of the Board of Directors is
appreciated in support of the long-term performance of our company. Please
acknowledge receipt of this proposal by email.
Sincerely,
/s/
Kenneth Steiner
6/25/07
Date
cc:
Edward J. Ludwig
Chairman
[APPENDIX]
[Rule 14a-8 Proposal, June 30, 2007]
3Elect Each Director Annually
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that our Directors take the steps necessary, in
the most expeditious manner possible, to adopt annual election of each director.
This includes complete transition from the current staggered system to 100%
annual election of each director in one election cycle unless this is absolutely
impossible. Also to transition solely through direct action of our board if
feasible.
The Council of Institutional Investors www.cji.org. formally recommends adoption
of this proposal topic. This topic also won a 69% yes-vote average at 44 major
companies in 2007.
Arthur Levitt, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 1993-2001
said: "In my view it's best for the investor if the entire board is elected once
a year. Without annual election of each director shareholders have far less
control over who represents them."
The advantage for the adoption of this proposal should be evaluated in the
context of our company's overall corporate governance. For instance in 2007 the
following governance status was reported (and certain concerns are noted):
Our directors were accountable to shareholder election only once in 3-years.
Four directors had potentially compromising non-director links to our company:
Dr. Sommer
Mr. Anderson
Mr. Mecklenburg
Mr. Mahmoud
Such directors held 4 seats on our key board committeesIndependence concern
We had an 80% shareholder vote requrement which could prevent us from
obtaining a profitable offer for our stock.
Our company had no Independent Chairman.
This was compounded by our Lead Director having 20-years tenureIndependence
concern.
We had no shareholder right to call a special meeting.
Total CEO annual pay was $10 million.
If management adopts a poison pill we are not guaranteed a right to vote on
it.
No cumulative voting.
The above deficiencies shows there is room for improvement and reinforces the
reason to take on step froward now and vote year:
Notes:
Kenneth Steiner, 14 Stoner Ave., 2M, Great Neck, NY 11021 sponsors this
proposal.
The above format is requested for publication without re-editing or
re-formatting.
The company is requested to assign a proposal number (represented by "3" above)
based on the chronological order in which proposals are submitted. The requested
designation of "3" or higher number allows for ratification of auditors to be
item 2.
This proposal is believed to conform with Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14B (CF),
September 15, 2004 including;
Accordingly, going forward, we believe that it would not be appropriate for
companies to exclude supporting statement language and/or an entire proposal in
reliance on rule 14a-8(i)(3) in the following circumstances:
the company objects to factual assertions because they are not supported;
the company objects to factual assertions that, while not materially false or
misleading, may be disputed or countered;
the company objects to factual assertions because those assertions may be
interpreted by shareholders in a manner that is unfavorable to the company, its
directors, or its officers; and/or
the company objects to statements because they represent the opinion of the
shareholder proponent or a referenced source, but the statements are not
identified specifically as such.
See also: Sun Microsystems, Inc. (July 21, 2005).
Please note that the title of the proposal is part of the argument in favor of
the proposal. In the interest of clarity and to avoid confusion the title of
this and each other ballot item is requested to be consistent throughout all the
proxy materials.
Please advise if there is any typographical question.
Stock will be held until after the annual meeting and the proposal will be
presented at the annual meeting.
Please acknowledge this proposal by email within 14-days and advise the most
convenient fax number and email address to forward a broker letter, if needed,
to the Corporate Secretary's office.
[INQUIRY LETTER]
September 28, 2007
Office of Chief Counsel
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549
Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) Shareholder Position on Company No-Action
Request Rule 14a-8 Proposal: Elect Each Director Annually Kenneth Steiner
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This is an initial response to the company September 27, 2007 no action request.
The following information supports the text in the rule 14a-8 proposal. This
information is accessed at:
http://www.boardanalyst.com/companies/custom/company_profile.asp?CompID=13109
which is from the "Board Analyst Profile for Becton, Dickinson and Company
(BDX)" published by The Corporate Library.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
12/22/2006 Proxy Information
Gary A. Mecklenburg, a member of the Board, retired effective September 1, 2006
as a director and the President and Chief Executive Officer of Northwestern
Memorial HealthCare, the parent corporation of Northwestern Memorial Hospital.
In fiscal year 2006, BD's sales to Northwestern Memorial Hospital (both direct
and through distributors) were approximately $2.2 million, which represented
approximately 0.2% of Northwestern Memorial HealthCare's consolidated operating
revenues for its last full fiscal year.
Adel A.F. Mahmoud, a member of the Board, retired effective September 1, 2006
from his position with Merck & Co., Inc. (see "Proposal 1. Election of
Directors" "Nominees for Director" on page 7). In fiscal year 2006, BD's sales
to Merck (both direct and through distributors) were approximately $35 million,
which represented approximately 0.16% of Merck's fiscal year consolidated
operating revenues for its last full fiscal year.
12/20/2005 Proxy Information
Gary A. Mecklenburg, a member of the Board, is a director and the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Northwestern Memorial HealthCare, the parent
corporation of Northwestern Memorial Hospital. In fiscal year 2005, BD's sales
to Northwestern Memorial Hospital (both direct and through a distributor) were
approximately $2.5 million, which represented approximately .23% of Northwestern
Memorial HealthCare's consolidated operating revenues.
In addition to the foregoing disclosures that are required under SEC rules, BD
has been a party to the following transactions with entities of which a member
of the Board serves or served in an executive capacity.
Basil L. Anderson, a member of the Board, is a director and the Vice Chairman of
Staples, Inc. ("Staples"). In fiscal year 2005, BD purchased approximately $2.3
million of office products from Staples pursuant to a contract that was
competitively bid.
Alfred Sommer, M.D., M.H.S., a member of the Board, is Professor of
International Health, Epidemiology, and Ophthalmology at the Bloomberg School of
Public Health (the "Bloomberg School") at The Johns Hopkins University ("JHU")
and the JHU Medical School. He is Dean Emeritus of the Bloomberg School, having
retired effective September 1, 2005. In fiscal year 2005, BD sponsored a
research arrangement with the Bloomberg School and also provided one-half of a
$600,000, multi-year commitment for a research collaboration with the Bloomberg
School, resulting in an aggregate expenditure to the Bloomberg School in fiscal
year 2005 of approximately $350,000. In fiscal year 2005, BD's sales to JHU
generally were approximately $3.1 million, which represented approximately .11%
of JHU's consolidated operating revenues. During fiscal year 2005, BD also paid
intellectual property licensing royalties to JHU in the amount of approximately
$357,000, and also paid JHU approximately $39,000, primarily for providing
routine medical services to BD associates. BD also made charitable contributions
to JHU for the Bloomberg School in fiscal year 2005 totaling $18,333 (see the
2005 Annual Report of Charitable Contributions attached as Appendix C to this
Proxy Statement)
12/17/2004 Proxy Information
Gary A. Mecklenburg, a member of the Board, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer, and a member of the Board of Directors, of Northwestern Memorial
HealthCare, the parent corporation of Northwestern Memorial Hospital. During
BD's fiscal year 2004, BD's sales to Northwestern Memorial Hospital (both direct
and through a distributor) were approximately $2.2 million, which represented
less than 1/4% of Northwestern Memorial HealthCare's consolidated operating
revenues.
In addition to the foregoing disclosure that is required under SEC rules, BD has
been a party to the following transactions with entities of which a member of
the Board serves in an executive capacity.
Basil L. Anderson, a member of the Board, is the Vice Chairman and a member of
the Board of Directors of Staples, Inc. ("Staples"). In fiscal year 2004, BD
purchased $1.7 million of office products from Staples pursuant to a contract
that was competitively bid.
Alfred Sommer, M.D., M.H.S., a member of the Board, is Dean of the Bloomberg
School of Public Health (the "Bloomberg School") at The Johns Hopkins University
("JHU"). In fiscal year 2004, BD sponsored several research arrangements with
the Bloomberg School involving an aggregate of approximately $230,000. BD also
has established a research collaboration with the Bloomberg School pursuant to
which BD has agreed to provide up to $600,000 in funding over the next three
fiscal years.
CURRENT COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Audit Committee (met 13 time(s) last year) |[NCCDEF] |[UCA1] |[TDC4,MP1,QL]
|[TCC4,M'Age',QC] |[TCC4,M'Board Tenure',QC] |[TCC4,M'Status (see',QC]
|[TCC4,MP1,QC] |[XT] |[ST]|[LC15]|[RS4]Name |[TA]Age |[TA]Board Tenure
|[TA]Committee Status (see below) |[TA]Relationship |[ST]Basil L. |[RS6]Anderson
|[TA]|[RS4]62 |[TA]3 |[TA]X |[TA]|[RS6]Outside Related |[ST]|[RS4]Edward F.
DeGraan |[TA]64 |[TA]4 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ST]Marshall O. Larsen |[TA]58
|[TA]0 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ST]Gary A. |[RS6]Mecklenburg |[TA]|[RS4]61 |[TA]3
|[TA]X |[TA]|[RS6]Outside Related |[ST]|[RS4]James F. Orr |[TA]62 |[TA]7 |[TA]C
|[TA]Outside |[ST]Bertram L. Scott |[TA]56 |[TA]5 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ET]
Compensation & Benefits Committee (met 6 time(s) last year) |[NCCDEF] |[UCA1]
|[TDC4,MP1,QL] |[TCC4,M'Age',QC] |[TCC4,M'Board Tenure',QC] |[TCC4,M'Status
(see',QC] |[TCC4,MP1,QC] |[XT] |[ST]|[LC15]|[RS4]Name |[TA]Age |[TA]Board Tenure
|[TA]Committee Status (see below) |[TA]Relationship |[ST]Basil L. |[RS6]Anderson
|[TA]|[RS4]62 |[TA]3 |[TA]X |[TA]|[RS6]Outside Related |[ST]|[RS4]Henry P.
Becton Jr. LD |[TA]64 |[TA]20 |[TA]C |[TA]Outside |[ST]Edward F. DeGraan |[TA]64
|[TA]4 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ST]Marshall O. Larsen |[TA]58 |[TA]0 |[TA]X
|[TA]Outside |[ST]James F. Orr |[TA]62 |[TA]7 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ST]Willard
J. Overlock Jr. |[TA]61 |[TA]8 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ET]
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee (met 7 time(s) last year) |[NCCDEF]
|[UCA1] |[TDC4,MP1,QL] |[TCC4,M'Age',QC] |[TCC4,M'Board Tenure',QC]
|[TCC4,M'Status (see',QC] |[TCC4,MP1,QC] |[XT] |[ST]|[LC15]|[RS4]Name |[TA]Age
|[TA]Board Tenure |[TA]Committee Status (see below) |[TA]Relationship
|[ST]Edward F. DeGraan |[TA]64 |[TA]4 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ST]|[RS6]Gary A.
Mecklenburg |[TA]|[RS4]61 |[TA]3 |[TA]X |[TA]|[RS6]Outside Related
|[ST]|[RS4]James E. Perrella |[TA]72 |[TA]12 |[TA]C |[TA]Outside |[ST]Bertram L.
Scott |[TA]56 |[TA]5 |[TA]X |[TA]Outside |[ET]
All Current and Retired Directors ... |[NCCDEF] |[UCA1] |[TDC4,MP1,QL]
|[TCC4,M'Age',QC] |[TCC4,M'Tenure',QC] |[TCC4,M'Boards',QC]
|[TCC4,M'Director',QC] |[XT] |[ST]|[LC15]|[RS4]Name |[TA]Age |[TA]|[RS6]Tenure
|[TA]|[RS4]Boards |[TA]Status |[ST]Henry P. |[RS6]Becton |[RS4]Jr. LD |[TA]64
|[TA]|[RS6]20 |[TA]|[RS4]2 |[TA]Director |[ET]
For the above reasons it is respectfully requested that concurrence not be
granted to the company. It is also respectfully requested that the shareholder
have the last opportunity to submit material in support of including this
proposalsince the company had the first opportunity.
Sincerely,
John Chevedden
cc:
Dean J. Paranicas
Corporate Secretary
Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX)
1 Becton Dr
Franklin Lakes, NJ 07417
Phone: 201 847-6800
PH: 201-847-7102
FX: 201-847-5583
Dean_J_Paranicas@bd.com
Kenneth Steiner
[STAFF REPLY LETTER]
October 31, 2007
Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance
Re: Becton, Dickinson and Company Incoming letter dated September 27, 2007
The proposal requests that the board take the necessary steps, in the most
expeditious manner possible, to adopt the annual election of each director.
We are unable to concur in your view that BD may exclude portions of the
proposal or supporting statement under rule 14a-8(i)(3). Accordingly, we do not
believe that BD may omit portions of the proposal or supporting statement under
rule 14a-8(i)(3).
Sincerely,
/s/
Ted Yu
Special Counsel
|