
[Bairnco Logo]
January 24, 2007
Dear Fellow Stockholder:
On June 22, 2006, Steel Partners, L.P. (Steel Partners),
through a wholly owned subsidiary BZ Acquisition Corp., announced an
unsolicited tender offer to purchase all of the issued and outstanding
common stock of Bairnco Corporation for $12.00 per share in cash,
without interest, subject to a number of significant conditions (the Offer).
After a thorough review of this Offer, Bairncos existing strategic
business plan, and other strategic alternatives, the Companys Board of
Directors determined that the Offer is inadequate, opportunistic and not
in the best interests of all of the Companys stockholders. Accordingly,
the Companys Board has recommended that you reject the Offer and not
tender your shares.
Protect Your
Interests Do Not Support Steel Partners
We strongly urge you to reject Steel Partners efforts to replace your
Board. As part of its plan to acquire Bairnco at a price that the Board
of Directors has determined to be inadequate and not in the best
interests of all of Bairncos stockholders, Steel Partners recently
commenced a process to solicit your written consents to take control of
your Board by removing the directors that you have elected and replacing
them with a slate of nominees that have been handpicked by Steel
Partners.
Your Board Has
and Will Continue to Act in the Best Interests of the Company and All of
its Stockholders
The Companys existing Board of Directors is open-minded, independent
and better suited to act in the best interests of ALL the Companys
stockholders than Steel Partners slate of handpicked nominees. Your
current Board has always upheld its fiduciary duty to act in the best
interests of ALL of the Companys stockholders and will continue to do
so. There is no guarantee that Steel Partners slate of nominees would
act in a similar manner due to the ties these nominees have to one
another and their affiliations with Steel Partners, which has an
interest in the Offer that is not the same as that of the Companys
other stockholders. In essence, a vote for Steel Partners slate of
nominees is a vote to give away control of the Company without getting a
control premium, or an adequate price for your stock.
The Offer
Dramatically Undervalues Bairnco
The Board believes that Steel Partners $12.00 per share Offer
dramatically undervalues Bairnco and would deny stockholders value that
is rightfully yours:
| |
|
|
| |
|
Management has undertaken significant
value-enhancing initiatives over the last year that are expected to
result in annual EBITDA for 2007 of $23.0 to $24.1 million, an
increase of approximately 46% to 54% over 2006 annual EBITDA (see
financial note below). Steel Partners Offer does not reflect
this increase in value. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
These initiatives include product and marketing
programs that are driving positive sales trends in our Arlon
Electronic Materials and Kasco divisions, the successful
start-up of a new
production facility in China, ongoing cost reduction programs, and
the acquisition of Atlanta SharpTech, which was accretive to
earnings in the fourth quarter of 2006 and is expected to be
accretive to earnings in 2007. |
| |
| |
|
The benefits of these initiatives have already
begun to bear fruit, with the Companys unaudited 2006 diluted
earnings per share increasing 38.3% over 2005 to $0.65 per share,
which exceeded our guidance for the year. The Company has also
tightened earnings per share guidance for 2007 to a range of $1.10
to $1.20. |
| |
| |
|
The Board has approved an increase of 43% in the
quarterly cash dividend to $0.10 per share from $0.07 per share,
based on the Companys strong financial condition, the demonstrated
contributions from the Atlanta SharpTech acquisition in the fourth
quarter of 2006 and the positive outlook for the Companys
performance. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
The price-earnings multiples implied by the $12.00
Offer further illustrate the inadequacy of Steel Partners Offer,
which not only fails to reflect current market values but also lacks
a control premium. The Offer represents valuation multiples of 10.0
to 10.9 times Bairncos expected 2007 EPS of $1.10 to $1.20, as
compared to average multiples of 17.5 and 18.4 times projected 2007
earnings for companies in the S&P 600 Small Cap and Russell 2000
indices. |
| |
| |
|
Steel Partners $12.00 per share Offer is well
below Bairncos current trading price levels and over 14% lower than
the recent 52-week high of
$14.00 per share.
|
Note: All earnings and net income numbers exclude the
impact of professional fees related to the Offer and Steel Partners
consent solicitation and certain related matters and a tax benefit from
an increased basis for income tax accounting purposes in certain real
property and related improvements booked during the third quarter of
2006.
We urge you to protect your investment in Bairnco and reject Steel
Partners efforts to take control of your Company. In order to do so, do
not sign Steel Partners gold consent card. If you have previously
signed a gold consent card, you may revoke that consent by signing,
dating and mailing the enclosed WHITE Consent Revocation Card
immediately. Finally, even if you have not signed Steel Partners
consent card, you can show your support for your Board by signing,
dating and mailing the enclosed WHITE Consent Revocation Card.
Regardless of the number of shares you own, your revocation of consent
is important. Please act today.
We appreciate your continued support.
On Behalf of the Board of Directors,
Sincerely,
/s
Luke E. Fichthorn, III,
Chairman and CEO
Bairnco Corporation
If you have any questions about revoking any consent you may have
previously granted or require assistance, please call:
[Georgeson Logo]
17 State Street 10th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Banks and Brokers Call 212.440.9800
All others call Toll-Free 1.866.695.6077
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation
Philosophy
The executive compensation program of the Company has been designed to
motivate, reward, attract, and retain the management deemed essential to
ensure the success of the Company. The program seeks to align executive
compensation with Company objectives, business strategy, and financial
performance. In applying these principles, the Company seeks to:
| |
|
|
| |
|
Reward executives for the enhancement of
stockholder value;
|
| |
| |
|
Support an environment that rewards performance
with respect to Company goals, as well as Company performance
relative to industry competitors;
|
| |
| |
|
Integrate compensation programs with the short and
long-term strategic plans of the Company; |
| |
| |
|
Attract and retain key executives critical to the
long-term success of the Company; and |
| |
| |
|
Align the interests of executives with the
long-term interests of stockholders through award opportunities that
can result in ownership of stock.
|
Compensation
Program Components
The compensation programs of the Company for its executive officers and
key employees are generally administered by or under the direction of
the Compensation Committee and are reviewed on an annual basis to ensure
that remuneration levels and benefits are competitive and reasonable
using the guidelines described above. The particular elements of the
compensation programs for such persons are set forth in more detail
below.
The Committee utilizes publicly available professional compensation
surveys and labor market studies, including those prepared by Hewitt and
Mercer, to make informed decisions regarding pay and benefit practices.
Surveys prepared by management are also used to periodically ensure that
the Company is maintaining its labor market competitiveness. These
internally-developed surveys compare the Companys compensation program
to the compensation programs of similar sized industrial companies. The
Company does not retain compensation consultants to advise the Company
on compensation matters. While the Company does not set compensation at
set percentage levels compared to the market, the Committee does seek to
provide salary, incentive compensation opportunity and employee benefits
that fall within the average practice of the Companys competitors and
the labor markets in which it participates.
Base Salary. Base salary levels are primarily determined
by the Committee at levels the Committee deems necessary or appropriate
to attract the level of competence needed for the position. The
Committee reviews base salary levels annually based on individual
performance from prior years, current industry conditions and current
market considerations to ensure that base salary levels for the
Companys executive officers and key employees are competitive within a
range that the Committee considers to be reasonable and necessary.
Performance Bonus. The Company provides incentive
compensation to its executive officers and key employees in the form of
annual cash bonuses relating to financial and operational achievements
during the prior year through the Companys Management Incentive
Compensation (MIC) Program.
The MIC bonus pool contains 1,000 points which are allocated to
executives and key employees at the beginning of each performance year,
in the Compensation Committees discretion, based on responsibilities
and contributions to the success of the business. The bonus pool is
funded based on meeting and exceeding financial targets in two areas:
return on net worth and earnings per share. The Company chose return on
net worth and earnings per share because it believed that Executives
should be rewarded for increasing shareholder value.
The bonus pool is funded as follows:
| |
|
|
| |
|
Return on Net Worth (RONW) over 10.0 percent. The
bonus pool contribution is 2.0% of Net Income above the 10.0% RONW
level, scaling up by two percentage points for each one point
increase in RONW to a maximum of 20% of Net Income at 20% or higher
RONW. |
25
| |
|
|
| |
|
Earnings Per Share. The EPS target
was established in 2001 when EPS was $0.42 per share and is
increased by 5.0% each year. $200,000 is contributed to the pool for
achieving the EPS target, with increases or decreases of $20,000 for
each $0.01 above or below that target.
|
At the end of the year, the bonus pool is divided by 1,000 points to
determine the value per point.
MIC participants work throughout the year against an established set of
goals and objectives. At the end of the year, they receive a grade that
judges the percentage of completion against those goals and objectives.
The annual incentive award payable to an executive officer cannot exceed
the maximum amount allocable to him from the bonus pool. In the case of
corporate administrative and financial officers, incentive compensation
decisions are made primarily on the basis of the assistance and
performance of the officer in implementing corporate objectives within
the scope of his or her responsibilities. In the case of operational
officers, incentive compensation decisions are made primarily on the
basis of operational results of the business operations for which the
officer is responsible. Although the achievement of certain financial
objectives as measured by a business segments earnings are considered
in determining incentive compensation, other subjective and less
quantifiable criteria are also considered. In this regard, the Committee
takes into account specific achievements that are expected to affect
future earnings and results or that had an identifiable impact on the
prior years results. Placing an emphasis on incentive compensation is
consistent with our philosophy of rewarding executives for meeting and
exceeding the Companys goals and exceptional individual performance.
MIC payouts are determined by multiplying (i) the points assigned
to the executive at the beginning of the performance year times (ii)
the personal performance grade earned by the executive for the
performance year times (iii) the point value. The Company has not
yet determined MIC payouts for 2006.
Stock Incentive Plan. The Company also provides long-term
incentive compensation to its executive officers and key employees
through stock options and restricted shares. The 2000 Bairnco Stock
Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan) was approved by
shareholders at the 2000 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. As originally
established, the Stock Incentive Plan provided for stock option awards.
In April 2003, the Board of directors amended the Stock Incentive Plan
to add a restricted stock award program. The restricted stock award
program permits the committee to grant to an employee an award
consisting of shares of Bairnco stock that are subject to specified
forfeiture and transfer restrictions. Upon the lapse of these
restrictions, the restricted stock award becomes vested. Generally, a
restricted stock award under the Stock Incentive Plan becomes vested if
the recipient remains employed until the fifth anniversary of the date
of the award. The restricted stock award recipient receives dividends
and voting rights during the vesting period. Under the terms of the
Stock Incentive Plan, the Committee has complete discretion in
determining eligibility for participation and the number of stock
options or restricted stock shares, if any, to be granted to a
participant. Stock option and restricted stock awards may be made from
the shares of the Companys Common Stock originally approved by the
shareholders for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan. The Committee
has established and follows guidelines with respect to the granting of
options and restricted stock awards under the Stock Incentive Plan to
employees. The use of these instruments is intended to provide
incentives to the Companys executive officers and key employees to work
toward the long-term growth of the Company by providing them with a
benefit that will increase only to the extent the value of the Common
Stock increases. Options and restricted shares are not granted by the
Committee as a matter of course as part of the regular compensation of
any executive or key employee. The decision to grant options or
restricted shares is based on the perceived incentive that the grant
will provide and the benefits that the grant may have on long-term
stockholder value. The determination of the number of shares granted is
based on the level and contribution of the employee. Consideration is
also given to the anticipated contribution of the business operations
for which the optionee has responsibility to overall stockholder value.
The Compensation Committee has only granted two equity awards to named
executive officers since 2003, when it granted 50,000 stock options
(vesting over three years) to the Chief Executive Officer and restricted
stock awards to certain of the Companys executive officers, including
the named executive officers. All of the restricted stock grants vest on
the fifth anniversary of the grant date in 2008. The Company believes
that these equity awards appropriately align the interests of the
executives with the interests of the Companys shareholders.
26
Bairnco
Retirement Plan
The Company maintains the Bairnco Corporation Retirement Plan (the Bairnco
Plan), a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan, for certain
of the Companys and its U.S. subsidiaries salaried and hourly
employees. The Bairnco Plan was frozen effective as of March 31, 2006,
and as a result, no new participants will enter the plan and the
benefits of current participants were being frozen as of that date.
Pension benefits payable under the frozen plan are based on a formula
that considers the participants years of service with the Company and
final average compensation levels. The Company froze the Bairnco Plan
because the Company believes that, on a going forward basis, the
Companys 401(k) will provide a better retirement compensation vehicle
for its employees and will be more cost efficient for the Company. For
further discussion of the pension plan, see the Pension Benefits table
below and accompanying narrative.
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Fichthorn will receive a
special retirement supplement that is intended to provide him a
retirement benefit comparable to what he would have received under the
Bairnco Plan (described above) if his combined past service as a
director of Bairncos former subsidiary, Keene Corporation, and Bairnco
were treated as years of service under that plan.
401(K) Plan
Effective April 1, 2006, Bairnco began making contributions to its
existing 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan to compensate for the loss of
continuing participation in the Companys pension plan. Those
contributions take two forms:
| |
|
|
| |
|
The Company contributes 1.0% of an employees
pre-tax earnings on a quarterly basis, whether or not the employee
makes contributions into his/her
account. |
| |
| |
|
The Company also provides a 50% match on all
employee contributions up to 4.0% of pay (a 2.0% match by the
Company).
|
Employment
Agreement
In 1990, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Luke
Fichthorn III that will expire December 31, 2007. The agreement provides
that if Mr. Fichthorn dies while an employee, his surviving spouse or
estate will receive a death benefit equal to three times the sum of (i)
his base salary, and (ii) the highest bonus paid to him during
the prior three years or the current year. If Mr. Fichthorns employment
terminates due to disability, he will receive 75% of his base salary for
two years and 55% of such salary thereafter until the disability ends or
his supplemental retirement benefits commence. If the Company terminates
Mr. Fichthorns employment without cause or breaches the agreement in a
material fashion leading Mr. Fichthorn to terminate his employment, the
Company will pay Mr. Fichthorn a lump sum benefit equal to the sum of (i)
four times his then base salary, and (ii) the highest bonus paid
or payable to him during the prior three years or the current year. The
agreement also provides that regardless of the reason for his
termination, Mr. Fichthorn and his spouse would have been entitled to
receive medical, health and hospitalization benefits following his
termination until he attains age 65 (or, in the event of his death,
until his spouse attains age 65). Mr. Fichthorn is age 65 and therefore
is no longer eligible for such continued welfare benefits.
For more information regarding the severance protections provided by
these agreements, see Employment Agreement with Mr. Fichthorn below.
Change of Control
Agreements
Change of control agreements protect income for key executives who would
likely be involved in decisions regarding
and/or successful
implementation of merger/acquisition activity and at risk for job loss
if a take-over occurs. The Board believed it was important to adopt such
agreements in order to provide an incentive for executives to remain
employed with the Company throughout the turmoil and uncertainty that an
unsolicited tender offer such as Steel Partners Offer can cause. Prior
to adopting the Change in Control agreements, the Board consulted with a
human resources consulting firm and determined that the terms and
amounts payable under the
27
Change of Control Agreement were reasonable and consistent with
severance arrangements for executives of companies similar to the
Company.
The Company has entered into change in control agreements with eight
senior executives (including three executive officers) including Kenneth
L. Bayne, Lawrence C. Maingot, Larry D. Smith, Daniel T. Holverson,
Elmer G. Pruim, Robert M. Carini, Brian E. Turner and Morgan Ebin.
Pursuant to these agreements, the Company will provide severance
benefits to such executive officers if their employment is terminated
within 24 months of a change in control of the Company, unless such
termination is (i) due to death or retirement, (ii) by the
Company for cause or due to disability or (iii) by the
executive without good reason. The amount of severance will be equal
to the sum of (a) the highest annual rate of salary in the twelve
months preceding the executive officers termination date and (b)
the higher of the executive officers average annual bonus for the past
two completed fiscal years or the executive officers target bonus for
the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. In addition to these
severance amounts, the executive officers will be entitled to a pro rata
annual bonus for the year in which their termination of employment
occurs and to continue participating in the Companys welfare benefit
programs for up to one year following termination of their employment.
If the executive officers become entitled to severance under the Change
in Control Agreements, they will not be entitled to severance pay under
any other agreement with the Company. These provisions enable the
executive to make decisions that are in the best interest of
shareholders without being distracted or influenced in the exercise of
his or her business judgment by personal concerns. Change of control
agreements are typically offered to executives in the marketplace and
thus are necessary to attract and retain executives as well as protect
shareholders interests. For more information regarding the change of
control protections provided by these agreements, see Change of Control
Agreements, below.
Compensation
Earned by the Chief Executive Officer
In considering the CEOs base salary, the Committee reviewed the
Companys general financial performance and the progress in improving
operating performance. The Committee also reviewed the CEOs base salary
against an internally developed salary survey of equivalent positions in
public companies of a similar size. This information showed Mr. Fichthorns
salary to be in the average range for industrial companies the size of
the Company. The Committee also considered the time period elapsed from
Mr. Fichthorns date of last increase in May of 2005. On May 1, 2006, he
received a salary increase of 2.5% resulting in a current salary for
Mr. Fichthorn of $471,500. In accordance with his contract, Mr. Fichthorn
is eligible for 25% of an MIC pool generated by a formula in his
contract. However, since 2001, Mr. Fichthorn has voluntarily waived this
portion of his contract on a
year-to-year basis and has agreed to participate in the MIC pool
that covers the Companys officers.
162(m) Disclosure
Based on current levels of compensation, no executive officer is
expected to receive compensation for 2006 services that would be
non-deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has not considered any revisions
to its policies and programs in response to this provision of law.
28
COMPENSATION OF MANAGEMENT
General
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation
paid, distributed, or accrued for services rendered during 2006 to the
Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and each of the two
other most highly compensated executive officers of Bairnco
(collectively the Named Executives).
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive
Plan
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Compensation(2)
|
|
|
Value(3)
|
|
|
Compensation(4)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
| (a) |
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
| |
|
Luke E. Fichthorn III
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
467,667 |
|
|
$ |
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,520 |
|
|
$ |
13,622 |
|
|
$ |
484,489 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth L. Bayne
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
172,292 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
9,160 |
|
|
$ |
181,452 |
|
|
Vice President/CFO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry D. Smith
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
181,167 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,163 |
|
|
$ |
8,625 |
|
|
$ |
189,792 |
|
|
Vice President Administration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lawrence C. Maingot
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
128,917 |
|
|
$ |
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,813 |
|
|
$ |
6,058 |
|
|
$ |
135,686 |
|
|
Corporate Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| (1) |
|
As disclosed in the Companys prior proxy
statements, Mr. Fichthorn was granted an option in 2003 to purchase
50,000 shares of the Companys stock. The option vested in annual
installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant
date. The number of options that vested during 2006 was 12,500. The
amount shown in column (f) is the dollar amount that would have been
required to be recognized in 2006 in accordance with FASB 123R under
the modified prospective transition method with respect to stock
options granted prior to 2006 that were not vested at the time that
the Company transitioned to FAS 123R.
The amount shown for Mr. Maingot is the dollar amount that would
have been required to be recognized in 2006 in accordance with FASB
123R under the modified prospective transition method with respect
to stock options granted prior to 2006 that were not vested at the
time that the Company transitioned to FAS 123R. |
| |
| (2) |
|
Non-equity incentive plan awards are made under
the Companys Management Incentive Compensation (MIC) Program which
is described in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
above. At the time of the mailing of this proxy statement, the
non-equity incentive plan awards for named executive officers had
not yet been determined for fiscal year 2006. |
| |
| (3) |
|
For a more in-depth discussion of the amounts
related to the change in pension value in 2006, see the Pension
Benefits table below and accompanying text. |
| |
| (4) |
|
Set forth below are each item reported in column
(i) that was provided to the executive in 2006. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Dividends on Restricted Stock |
|
|
Savings Plan Allocations* |
|
| |
|
Luke E. Fichthorn III
|
|
$ |
10,920 |
|
|
$ |
2,702 |
|
|
Kenneth L. Bayne
|
|
$ |
5,200 |
|
|
$ |
3,960 |
|
|
Larry D. Smith
|
|
$ |
4,420 |
|
|
$ |
4,205 |
|
|
Lawrence C. Maingot
|
|
$ |
3,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,938 |
|
| |
|
|
| * |
|
Includes matching contributions related to
contributions made by the Named Officers to the 401(k) Savings Plan.
Additional true up contributions for 2006 may be made in January
2007. If so, they will be reported in a supplemental filing. |
29
GRANT OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Future Payouts
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Under
Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards (1) |
|
| |
|
Grant
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Date |
|
|
($) |
|
|
($) |
|
| (a) |
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
| |
| Luke
E. Fichthorn III |
|
|
January 26, 2006 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
Kenneth L. Bayne |
|
|
January 26, 2006 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
| Larry
D. Smith |
|
|
January 26, 2006 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
|
Lawrence C. Maingot |
|
|
January 26, 2006 |
|
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
|
$ |
54,000 |
|
| |
|
|
| (1) |
|
These awards were granted pursuant to the terms
of the Companys Management Incentive Compensation (MIC) Program, an
annual non-equity incentive plan. The MIC Program is described in
detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, above. The
grant date shown above is the date that the Board determined the
named executives percentage interest in the bonus pool. The
threshold is the executives share of the amount that would be
allocated to the bonus pool if the Company achieved at least $0.53
earnings per share but failed to achieve its Return on Net Worth
goal. The target is the amount the executive would receive
assuming his entire award at budgeted levels becomes payable and is
not reduced based on personal performance against established
objectives. The plan does not have a maximum limit on the amount
of the award that may be paid under the plan. At the time of the
mailing of this proxy statement, the non-equity incentive plan
awards for named executive officers had not yet been determined for
fiscal year 2006. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
| |
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Market
Value of
|
|
| |
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
or Units
that
|
|
|
Shares or
Units that
|
|
| |
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
have not
Vested
|
|
|
have not
Vested
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
| |
| Luke
E. Fichthorn III |
|
|
83,334 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
|
|
5/31/10 |
|
|
|
42,000 |
(3) |
|
$ |
535,500 |
|
| |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
2/3/14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
2/3/15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
2/3/16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
12,500 |
(1) |
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
2/3/17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth L. Bayne |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
(4) |
|
$ |
255,000 |
|
| Larry
D. Smith |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
6.375 |
|
|
|
5/21/10 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
(3) |
|
$ |
216,750 |
|
| |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
6.375 |
|
|
|
5/21/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
6.375 |
|
|
|
5/21/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
6.375 |
|
|
|
5/21/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
| |
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Market
Value of
|
|
| |
|
Options
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
or Units
that
|
|
|
Shares or
Units that
|
|
| |
|
(#)
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
have not
Vested
|
|
|
have not
Vested
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
($) |
|
|
Date |
|
|
(#) |
|
|
($) |
|
| |
|
Lawrence C. Maingot
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7.50 |
|
|
|
3/18/07 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
(3) |
|
$ |
153,000 |
|
| |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7.50 |
|
|
|
3/18/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7.875 |
|
|
|
6/13/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7.875 |
|
|
|
6/13/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7.875 |
|
|
|
6/13/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
7.875 |
|
|
|
6/13/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
6.875 |
|
|
|
12/9/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
$ |
|