|
Overview
|
Civil
money penalties are an enforcement tool whereby the
financial regulatory agencies can assess substantial
monetary penalties against the institutions they regulate
and those institutions' IAPs
- CMPs are
not restitution
- Purpose is not
only to punish those who violate laws and sound
banking practices, but also to deter future
violations.
- Normally, CMPs
do not trigger the double jeopardy provisions
of the US Constitution
- CMPs may be issued
in connection with other regulatory sanctions
and remedies
- See
In Re Donohoo (Removal Order, temporary
C&D, restitution and CMP)
In
general, CMP Orders may be issued for violation of:
- a law or regulation
- a C&D Order
- a written condition
imposed by an agency in connection with an application
- a written agreement
- or for gross
misconduct involving: unsafe or unsound banking
practices or breach of fiduciary duty
Each
head of an agency that issues CMPs is required to periodically
adjust the amounts of the CMPs in order to keep pace
with the rate of inflation. See note following
28 USC 2461
Regulations
regarding CMP amount adjustments
- OCC -
12 CFR Part 19.240
- FRB -
12 CFR Part 263.65
- FDIC -
12 CFR Part 308.132
- OTS -
12 CFR Part 509.103
- NCUA -
121 CFR Part 747.1001
- N.B.
The agencies have adjusted many, but not
all, of their civil money penalties by
regulation. The agencies have neither
adjusted the penalties in all the statutes
which they enforce concurrently, nor, when
making adjustments, always uniformly
increased the maximum amounts of such
penalties.
Although differences are pointed out in
certain instances below, each
agencys regulations must be carefully
compared with the applicable statutes
|
Statutory Scheme, Penalty Amounts and Calculations
|
There
are two major statutory provisions relating to CMPs:
Section 8(i)(2) of the FDIA (12
USC 1818(i)(2)) (utilized by the OCC, FRB, FDIC
and OTS) and Section 206(k) of the FCUA (12
USC 1786(k)) (utilized by the NCUA)
The
federal banking agencies have consolidated the spectrum
of CMP offenses into three broad levels or tiers
Potential
penalties are based, among other factors, upon which
"tier" the offense falls into. Potential penalties
are applicable to both insured depository institutions
and IAPs for -
First
Tier: violations of:
- Any law or
regulation;
- Any final
or temporary order issued under section
8 or any final order under
12 USC 1831o or
12 USC 1831p-1;
- Any condition
imposed in writing in connection with the
grant of any application or other request
by such depository institution;
- Any written
agreement between such depository institution
and such agency
-
Penalty - shall
forfeit and pay a CMP of not more than $6,500
for each day during which the violation
continues [amount increased from $5,000]
Second
tier: knowingly:
- Committing
any First Tier violation by recklessly
engaging in an unsafe and unsound practice
in conducting the affairs of such insured
depository institution; or,
- Breaching
any fiduciary duty;
provided that such violation, practice,
or breach:
- Is part of
a pattern of misconduct;
- Or, causes
or is likely to cause more than a minimal
loss to such depository institution;
- Or results
in pecuniary gain or other benefit to such
party,
-
Penalty - shall
forfeit and pay a CMP of not more than $32,500
for each day during which such violation, practice,
or breach continues [amount increased from
$25,000].
Third
Tier: any insured depository institution
which, and any IAP who knowingly
SEC_CODE_REF_0090001192884
- Commits any
violation described in the First Tier;
- Engages in
any unsafe or unsound practice in conducting
the affairs of such depository institution;
or
- Breaches
any fiduciary duty; and
- Knowingly
or recklessly causes a substantial loss
to such depository institution or a
substantial pecuniary gain to such party by reason of such violation
or practice
-
Penalty
- shall forfeit and pay a CMP of not
more than: (i) in the case of any person
other than an insured depository
institution, an amount to not exceed
$1,250,000 [amount increased from
$1,000,000]; and (ii) in the case
of any insured depository institution,
an amount not to exceed the lesser of--
(I) $1,250,000; or (II) 1 percent of
the total assets of such institution.
[Amount increased from $1,000,000.]
Assessment
and Hearing:
any penalty imposed under any of the three tiers may be assessed and
collected by the appropriate Federal banking agency by written notice.
- If a hearing is not timely requested, the
assessment constitutes a final and unappealable order.
12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(2)(E)
- The hearing shall be afforded if it is requested
within twenty days after the issuance of the notice of assessment.
12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(2)(H)
- Hearings, decisions, orders, and judicial review
are provided for in
12 U.S.C. 1818(h)
- The appropriate Federal banking agency may
compromise, modify, or remit any penalty which it may assess or already had
assessed under any of the three tiers.
12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(2)(F)
- The agency that imposed the penalty shall recover
the amount assessed by action in the appropriate U.S. district court, if the
insured depository institution or other person fails to pay an assessment after
any such penalty has become final,
12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(2)(I)
- In appropriate circumstances the agency may
obtain a temporary restraining order affecting funds, assets, or other property,
and the appointment of a temporary receiver to administer the restraining
order.
12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(4)
Mitigating
Factors - In determining the amount of any penalty
imposed under section 8(i)(2)s First, Second, or Third
Tiers, the appropriate agency is required to take into
account the appropriateness of the penalty with respect
to:
- The size of financial
resources and good faith of the insured depository
institution or other person charged;
- The gravity of the
violation;
- The history of previous
violations; and
- Such other matters
as justice may require.
12 U.S.C. 1818(i)(2)(G)
- The mitigating factors
apply to both consent and adjudicated CMPs
- Agency has the
burden of going forward with evidence
establishing the respondents ability to pay; it
is not an affirmative defense.
Dazzio v FDIC,
970 F2d 71 (5thCir, 1992)
- Note that some Federal
laws have their own schedule of penalties and/or
list of mitigating factors
- See, e.g., the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, as
amended,
42 USC 4012a(f), and section 21B of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
15 USC 78u-2
For
a more in-depth discussion of CMP penalties, see the
topic page
Calculation and Assessment of Civil Money Penalties
|
CMP Regulations
Law Firm Commentaries
|